Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "Is U Chicago worth cost over in-state UVA?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I went to UVa undergrad and Chicago Booth for my MBA. Post MBA, I worked for McKinsey in Chicago. [b]There were more UVA undergrad hires (business analysts) from UVA than UC in the Chicago office. [/b] If your kid wants to go back east after college, UVA Comm school and/or Echols is better. U of C is definitely a nerdy environment. "Where fun goes to die" is the joke. Two different places to be sure, but can't go wrong with either. If money is an issue, choose UVa. If not, let the kid choose.[/quote] I'm not surprised. After 4 years enjoying Chicago, a good number of the business oriented UChicago kids are being heavily recruited by NY and SF and they're excited about that. Kids tend to want to experience different places in their 20s. I can see why a UVA kid would love to try out Chicago and a UChicago kid would want to head to the coasts. [/quote] Unless things have changed greatly in the last few years there are few Chicago grads working in NY firms compared to their peers at other big schools (why SF? That's Silicon Valley). Chicago is a big place and post-collegiate is always a very different experience than undergraduate, even in the same city. The simple truth is that historically Chicago undergrad has not placed as many kids in the finance/business world. It wasn't that kind of school. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics