Reply to DCI Parent Petition

Forum Index » DC Public and Public Charter Schools

Reply to "DCI Parent Petition "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The clock-in issue is one bullet point in a six-page letter that documents potential legal violations, a nepotism concern, a $56,500 executive bonus while aides took home less than last year, 37 special education staff departures affecting nearly 500 students with IEPs, and an ED who made a documented false statement to a community member.

If the only thing in that letter were the clock-in policy, you'd be right to dismiss it. But it isn't and the repeated focus on that one point while ignoring everything else isn't engaging with the actual case being made.

And the letter isn't objecting to accountability. It's objecting to deductions applied in increments as small as 0.1 hours for arriving six minutes late when staff have no in-person duties. That's not accountability. That's punitive micromanagement designed to make people miserable enough to leave.

The letter asks for staff and parent voice in the process, not staff control. Those are different things. A search committee with community representation is standard governance practice at healthy schools.

On your LAMB experience: one bad outcome from a flawed process isn't an argument against community involvement in leadership searches. It's an argument for doing it better. The alternative you're describing, leaving it entirely to a board that appointed an investigator with a 6-figure financial relationship to the school, is not obviously safer.[/quote]

I don't have a horse in this race as I'm not part of the DCI community, but I will say that this poster consistently using AI to write their arguments (the "it's not this, it's that" over and over again is a dead giveaway) doesn't strengthen them in any way.  As an outside observer who's been in the education community for a while but doesn't directly know any of the parties involved, there isn't anything in the letter that would warrant a vote of no confidence.  Should aides be paid more?  Yes - and that's true in every school.  The bonus isn't the ED's choice. If you want to complain about that you should blame the board.  The "documented false statement to a community member" is blown up way more than what it actually is.  Legal and nepotism concerns warrant investigation but from what I see in the letter there doesn't seem to be an issue there. And that many staff departures definitely doesn't sound good, though I don't know the circumstances there. So while there may be legitimate issues, the letter doesn't really support that cause.  [/quote]

Sure you don't have a horse in this race. And of course AI is being used. The point is that the arguments are sourced from the 6-page staff letter, a Form 990, an audited financial statement, DC law, and McGuireWoods' own website. The structure of the argument reflects the structure of the evidence. The documents are real and publicly available for anyone to verify.

Also the board approves comp. The board approved a $56,500 bonus for the ED while simultaneously approving a pay structure that left some aides taking home less than last year despite negotiated raises. That's a board governance failure and the board is exactly who we're holding accountable.

The ED told an alum that conversations about the DP Coordinator's future at DCI were ongoing. They were not. He was confronted with this and only then did those conversations begin. At a school whose entire disciplinary and cultural framework is built on IB learner profile values, including being principled and acting with integrity, the ED making a documented false statement to a community member is not a minor footnote. It is a character issue.

And I don't see how you see no issue with the staff letter. 175 staff members who work in that building every day disagreed with you. They have direct knowledge you and I don't have. The letter is the public-facing summary of three years of documented failed attempts to address concerns through proper channels.

All we've asked for is an independent investigation with a clearly defined scope, conducted by a firm without a current financial relationship to the school, led by a board chair without conflicts of her own. What we have instead is McGuireWoods, who was paid $130,000 by DCI in the same fiscal year they were appointed, investigating concerns raised by a unionized staff, selected by a board chair who is a partner at the firm at the center of DC's most documented charter school governance scandal.[/quote]

Repeating the same thing over and over again doesn’t make it more convincing.

Forgetting to tell Chat to be concise honestly just makes it more frustrating. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics