Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Private & Independent Schools
Reply to "My 4 Yr Old Son's FSIQ is 131, Now What?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I'm sorry but I don't buy it. I think you have just run out of ideas to defend your position because your position is flawed. The information pasted makes sense, is concise, and is logical and reasonable. It's hard to argue with it so you are making excuses and taking your balls and going home.[/quote] I'm 12:12 who originally posted my opt-out. You don't even know what my position is or that it's flawed, because I haven't posted for several pages now, so I don't appreciate your judgment/accusations. And I must say, I can't even tell what your position is, because you just keep posting long cut-outs without any clear statement of where you actually stand. I can't tell whether or not I agree with you, and I'm not interested in trying to agree/disagree with all the hundreds of points in 42 different sub-arguments from half a dozen different articles you are copying. I'm not opting out because I disagree with the substance, but rather because you're doing a data dump.[/quote] The only data dump I see after going all the way back to page 8 is the NAGC advocacy statement. I hardly call a one page document overwhelming. The information was very concise and nicely summarized the points I was attempting to make on my own in other posts. The only other posts that I might be inclined to think you are referring to as data dumps are those that include links to research articles, etc. Those links were posted as a means to back up my stated position with research. You can choose to read them or not. But the point in including them is to provide data to prove that I'm not just pulling opinions out of my ass as well as to share information with others. I will also point out that I'm not the only poster to post links to back up opinions on this thread or other threads for that matter. This forum is great for conversing but its also an excellent way to recieve and share information beyond what people have in their heads. So, this is why I don't buy your data dump reasoning. Maybe you believe that my other posts are cut outs from various sources and if that is the case that is not a correct assumption. I really don't see any reason for you to think that though from reviewing all of the posts (because I'm not the sole author of every post other than yours and the IQ test skeptic). Also, I always provide some sort of source information when posting information other than my own opinions. I'm sorry to have come across as judging your position which I agree I'm not familiar with. That part of my post was really directed at the following poster who glommed on to your reasoning about the data dump. Her position was apparent and in my opinion flawed and disproven many times over. So, I'm sorry but I'm a skeptic and still think that you're a copout. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics