Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "The Blind Side scandal"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The fact that they picked a conservatorship over an adoption is so suspect. Why would they need to go that route, if not for money?[/quote] One article I read stated that because Michael was over 18 at the time, traditional adoption was not an option. [/quote] Have you read any of the posts? That is not true. They could have adopted him. They didn't but lead him to believe they did. [/quote] If he watched the movie, he would know that he wasn’t adopted. The Tuohys applied to become his legal guardians in the film and presumably also in the book. I’m sure the Tuohys told him he was a member of the family, but legally he never was and that’s all public information. [/quote] In Sean’s own words: “ I sat Michael down and told him, ‘If you're planning to go to Ole Miss — or even considering Ole Miss — we think you have to be part of the family. This would do that, legally.’ ” This is a straight up lie. Britney Spears had a lawyer as part of her conservatorship did that make her part of his family as well? [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics