Anonymous wrote:[youtube]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is all you need to know about this family:

"We divided it five ways," the Tuohys wrote in their 2010 book, "In a Heartbeat: Sharing the Power of Cheerful Giving."

Um, it should have been divided in HALF. 50 to Michael and 50 to the family. Why are they getting 4/5 of the cut?!!

It’s the entire family’s story and fair that each member was compensated, but I think they should’ve divided it three ways and given a share to each child.

Without the one of them who’s still not family there would be no story.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Really though if the family is worth $200 million why would they need small royalties from the movie? Makes no sense and I believe them.

Fame. Had you heard of Leigh Ann before this?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My confusion is why did this take so long to come out. He was recently married- wonder if the wife uncovered any of this? Or does she want more?

He became aware that all 4 members of the Touey family were getting royalties from the movie while he was getting nothing. When he questioned good ole dad he didn't get straight answers. He hired a lawyer to look in to this and that's when they discovered he was never adopted. The discovery took a lot of time. He has been working on this for some time.

It's interesting that they claim he blackmailed them and said he go to the press with bad stories about them if they didn't give him a bunch of money. How manipulative. He probably told them pay me a portion of the proceeds you've made off of me or I will go public. That's hardly blackmail. What horribly manipulative dishonest people. Gross.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The fact that they picked a conservatorship over an adoption is so suspect. Why would they need to go that route, if not for money?

One article I read stated that because Michael was over 18 at the time, traditional adoption was not an option.

Have you read any of the posts? That is not true. They could have adopted him. They didn't but lead him to believe they did.

If he watched the movie, he would know that he wasn’t adopted. The Tuohys applied to become his legal guardians in the film and presumably also in the book. I’m sure the Tuohys told him he was a member of the family, but legally he never was and that’s all public information.

Anonymous wrote:Really though if the family is worth $200 million why would they need small royalties from the movie? Makes no sense and I believe them.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is all you need to know about this family:

"We divided it five ways," the Tuohys wrote in their 2010 book, "In a Heartbeat: Sharing the Power of Cheerful Giving."

Um, it should have been divided in HALF. 50 to Michael and 50 to the family. Why are they getting 4/5 of the cut?!!

It’s the entire family’s story and fair that each member was compensated, but I think they should’ve divided it three ways and given a share to each child.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My confusion is why did this take so long to come out. He was recently married- wonder if the wife uncovered any of this? Or does she want more?

He became aware that all 4 members of the Touey family were getting royalties from the movie while he was getting nothing. When he questioned good ole dad he didn't get straight answers. He hired a lawyer to look in to this and that's when they discovered he was never adopted. The discovery took a lot of time. He has been working on this for some time.

It's interesting that they claim he blackmailed them and said he go to the press with bad stories about them if they didn't give him a bunch of money. How manipulative. He probably told them pay me a portion of the proceeds you've made off of me or I will go public. That's hardly blackmail. What horribly manipulative dishonest people. Gross.

That's exactly what blackmail is: demanding money to keep quiet about something compromising.

If the money is rightfully his, he should get the money and tell the truth publicly.

When he realized how much they gained without compensating him a fair portion, he may have given them an opportunity to settle quietly. See how easy that is to spin? But agree, I'm glad it's public now. If everything he said is true, or even large parts of it, they should fork over some money and pay in terms of the ample social capital they've accrued from this relationship.

Anonymous wrote:This is all you need to know about this family:

"We divided it five ways," the Tuohys wrote in their 2010 book, "In a Heartbeat: Sharing the Power of Cheerful Giving."

Um, it should have been divided in HALF. 50 to Michael and 50 to the family. Why are they getting 4/5 of the cut?!!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Really though if the family is worth $200 million why would they need small royalties from the movie? Makes no sense and I believe them.

It's not just about the royalties. They became celebrities and made lots of money on the speaker circuit, where Leigh Ann presented herself as his adoptive mother. They benefited enormously from the PR about their familial relationship, which we now know was false. Let it all come out in court, will enjoy seeing the receipts.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My confusion is why did this take so long to come out. He was recently married- wonder if the wife uncovered any of this? Or does she want more?

He became aware that all 4 members of the Touey family were getting royalties from the movie while he was getting nothing. When he questioned good ole dad he didn't get straight answers. He hired a lawyer to look in to this and that's when they discovered he was never adopted. The discovery took a lot of time. He has been working on this for some time.

It's interesting that they claim he blackmailed them and said he go to the press with bad stories about them if they didn't give him a bunch of money. How manipulative. He probably told them pay me a portion of the proceeds you've made off of me or I will go public. That's hardly blackmail. What horribly manipulative dishonest people. Gross.

That's exactly what blackmail is: demanding money to keep quiet about something compromising.

If the money is rightfully his, he should get the money and tell the truth publicly.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My confusion is why did this take so long to come out. He was recently married- wonder if the wife uncovered any of this? Or does she want more?

He became aware that all 4 members of the Touey family were getting royalties from the movie while he was getting nothing. When he questioned good ole dad he didn't get straight answers. He hired a lawyer to look in to this and that's when they discovered he was never adopted. The discovery took a lot of time. He has been working on this for some time.

It's interesting that they claim he blackmailed them and said he go to the press with bad stories about them if they didn't give him a bunch of money. How manipulative. He probably told them pay me a portion of the proceeds you've made off of me or I will go public. That's hardly blackmail. What horribly manipulative dishonest people. Gross.

Anonymous wrote:Really though if the family is worth $200 million why would they need small royalties from the movie? Makes no sense and I believe them.