Reply to SCOTUS Protection Request

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "SCOTUS Protection Request"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I would not want a progressive Justice, voting to allow less restricted euthanasia, for example, to be threatened at their private home. I am for protecting Justices' families, and particularly minor children, from any controversy surrounding their parent's professional decisions.

It's hard to watch a Clarence and a treasonous Ginny strutting about without fear of consequences. It's hard to read Alito citing such racist and misogynist texts upon which to base his decision and writing about women in such a degrading manner.

But this is their job. They should not be disturbed at their home.[/quote]

It's also the job of health care providers to deliver services, including abortions, at reproductive health centers, but SCOTUS ruled that anti-choice protesters can get right up in their faces as well as that of clients and scream their heads off (great in COVID). Anti-choice folks doxx these staff, including their children.

Chucking concealed carry and absolving drivers from prosecution if they run over protesters jeopardizes my 1A rights to speak openly. The justices are now realizing that there may also be consequences for their opinions, just like the rest of us.[/quote]

PP you replied to. I was speaking from a moral point of view. Just because lowlifes do terrible things, it doesn't mean I must dirty my conscience by going down to their level. But as long as it's not illegal, you go ahead and do whatever you want.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics