Anonymous
07/08/2022 22:02
Subject: SCOTUS Protection Request
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Kavanaugh had to leave by back door while dining at Morton's Steaks because of demonstrations at front. Poor whittle beer guzzler. Owner or manager was upset. I don't think he realizes that women generally choose the restaurant. Boycott Morton's and all restaurants that serve these six justices.
https://meaww.com/mortons-brett-kavanaugh-restaurant-protests?utm_source=smartnewsapp&utm_medium=articlelink&utm_campaign=575711
Try this with purported liberal Justices and you'll have Merrick Garland breathing down your neck.
Or, at the very least... a pre-dawn raid with CNN in tow.
And, of course.... Twitter allows this targeted harassment.
We do what we can do.
Classy group of folks. Do you honestly think stalking a public official will change his/her interpretation of the law? Oh, well! I could not eat in peace? Well, okay then - abortion is great!
I dunno. Lots of people think that screaming at women and girls seeking health care might intimidate them into changing their minds. Well, ok, then — I’ll have my rapist’s baby. Shared custody with an abuser is great! So, it might be worth a try.
And how did you make the leap from protesting to “stalking”?
DP. I guess you didn't see the tweet from Shut Down DC.
Classic stalking.
No worries, though. We'll do our part too.
I may just be a "DC Industry Worker" who has multiple sightings of these conservative Justices. Even though I live nowhere near DC.
Time to flood their site. With sighting after sighting after sighting.
I may just join you. I feel like I might spot the justices in South Jersey, or perhaps somewhere in WV. I'm sure those activists would enjoy a nice road trip.
Anonymous
07/08/2022 21:59
Subject: SCOTUS Protection Request
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Kavanaugh had to leave by back door while dining at Morton's Steaks because of demonstrations at front. Poor whittle beer guzzler. Owner or manager was upset. I don't think he realizes that women generally choose the restaurant. Boycott Morton's and all restaurants that serve these six justices.
https://meaww.com/mortons-brett-kavanaugh-restaurant-protests?utm_source=smartnewsapp&utm_medium=articlelink&utm_campaign=575711
Try this with purported liberal Justices and you'll have Merrick Garland breathing down your neck.
Or, at the very least... a pre-dawn raid with CNN in tow.
And, of course.... Twitter allows this targeted harassment.
We do what we can do.
You sure do. Astounding that you're proud of that behavior, but you do you.
DP
Anonymous
07/08/2022 21:57
Subject: SCOTUS Protection Request
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Kavanaugh had to leave by back door while dining at Morton's Steaks because of demonstrations at front. Poor whittle beer guzzler. Owner or manager was upset. I don't think he realizes that women generally choose the restaurant. Boycott Morton's and all restaurants that serve these six justices.
https://meaww.com/mortons-brett-kavanaugh-restaurant-protests?utm_source=smartnewsapp&utm_medium=articlelink&utm_campaign=575711
Try this with purported liberal Justices and you'll have Merrick Garland breathing down your neck.
Or, at the very least... a pre-dawn raid with CNN in tow.
And, of course.... Twitter allows this targeted harassment.
Yep. "Hypocrites" doesn't even begin to describe these people. I happen to be pro-choice, but this behavior is sickening. Were there conservative activists targeting justices' homes back in 1973 when Roe came into existence? No. Why are liberal activists such complete loons?
Anonymous
07/08/2022 21:53
Subject: SCOTUS Protection Request
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Kavanaugh had to leave by back door while dining at Morton's Steaks because of demonstrations at front. Poor whittle beer guzzler. Owner or manager was upset. I don't think he realizes that women generally choose the restaurant. Boycott Morton's and all restaurants that serve these six justices.
https://meaww.com/mortons-brett-kavanaugh-restaurant-protests?utm_source=smartnewsapp&utm_medium=articlelink&utm_campaign=575711
Try this with purported liberal Justices and you'll have Merrick Garland breathing down your neck.
Or, at the very least... a pre-dawn raid with CNN in tow.
And, of course.... Twitter allows this targeted harassment.
We do what we can do.
Classy group of folks. Do you honestly think stalking a public official will change his/her interpretation of the law? Oh, well! I could not eat in peace? Well, okay then - abortion is great!
I dunno. Lots of people think that screaming at women and girls seeking health care might intimidate them into changing their minds. Well, ok, then — I’ll have my rapist’s baby. Shared custody with an abuser is great! So, it might be worth a try.
And how did you make the leap from protesting to “stalking”?
DP. Are you unable to read?
"Activists are now offering a $200 bounty on the location of any justice."
Anonymous
07/08/2022 21:45
Subject: Re:SCOTUS Protection Request
Where is everybody getting the idea that there are ongoing protests at Kavanaugh's house? I live near him and sometimes drive up the street by his house and still haven't seen any protestors. There are lots of yard signs from Chevy Chase for Choice which I was so gratified to see, but he seems to be able to enjoy plenty of peace and quiet. There is so much hyperbole about what the justices are enduring it would be laughable if those five liars weren't so busy dragging us all back to the 16th century. What a bunch of whiners.
Anonymous
07/08/2022 21:40
Subject: SCOTUS Protection Request
Anonymous wrote:How do I get protection? I would like to be able to take my kids to the park, a parade or to school without them getting shot.
THIS
+ 1 MILIION
Anonymous
07/08/2022 21:36
Subject: SCOTUS Protection Request
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would not want a progressive Justice, voting to allow less restricted euthanasia, for example, to be threatened at their private home. I am for protecting Justices' families, and particularly minor children, from any controversy surrounding their parent's professional decisions.
It's hard to watch a Clarence and a treasonous Ginny strutting about without fear of consequences. It's hard to read Alito citing such racist and misogynist texts upon which to base his decision and writing about women in such a degrading manner.
But this is their job. They should not be disturbed at their home.
It's also the job of health care providers to deliver services, including abortions, at reproductive health centers, but SCOTUS ruled that anti-choice protesters can get right up in their faces as well as that of clients and scream their heads off (great in COVID). Anti-choice folks doxx these staff, including their children.
Chucking concealed carry and absolving drivers from prosecution if they run over protesters jeopardizes my 1A rights to speak openly. The justices are now realizing that there may also be consequences for their opinions, just like the rest of us.
PP you replied to. I was speaking from a moral point of view. Just because lowlifes do terrible things, it doesn't mean I must dirty my conscience by going down to their level. But as long as it's not illegal, you go ahead and do whatever you want.
Anonymous
07/08/2022 21:20
Subject: SCOTUS Protection Request
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is good for the goose s good for the gander. The Republicans on the Supreme Court have blood on their hands for increasing gun rights + enslaving women. Now they want to cry about their rights while depriving others of theirs.
Hoo boy... "blood on their hands," "enslaving women." You guys certainly excel at hyperbole.
It isn't hyperbole to a woman who needs an abortion. It isn't hyperbole in Uvalde, Buffalo, Highland Park and do many other places. All Republicans have blood in their hands.
Anonymous
07/08/2022 21:15
Subject: SCOTUS Protection Request
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Kavanaugh had to leave by back door while dining at Morton's Steaks because of demonstrations at front. Poor whittle beer guzzler. Owner or manager was upset. I don't think he realizes that women generally choose the restaurant. Boycott Morton's and all restaurants that serve these six justices.
https://meaww.com/mortons-brett-kavanaugh-restaurant-protests?utm_source=smartnewsapp&utm_medium=articlelink&utm_campaign=575711
Try this with purported liberal Justices and you'll have Merrick Garland breathing down your neck.
Or, at the very least... a pre-dawn raid with CNN in tow.
And, of course.... Twitter allows this targeted harassment.
We do what we can do.
Classy group of folks. Do you honestly think stalking a public official will change his/her interpretation of the law? Oh, well! I could not eat in peace? Well, okay then - abortion is great!
Thank you for sharing with us as the majority of Americans agree that women having a right to a safe abortion is, indeed, a great thing.
Anonymous
07/08/2022 20:55
Subject: SCOTUS Protection Request
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Kavanaugh had to leave by back door while dining at Morton's Steaks because of demonstrations at front. Poor whittle beer guzzler. Owner or manager was upset. I don't think he realizes that women generally choose the restaurant. Boycott Morton's and all restaurants that serve these six justices.
https://meaww.com/mortons-brett-kavanaugh-restaurant-protests?utm_source=smartnewsapp&utm_medium=articlelink&utm_campaign=575711
Try this with purported liberal Justices and you'll have Merrick Garland breathing down your neck.
Or, at the very least... a pre-dawn raid with CNN in tow.
And, of course.... Twitter allows this targeted harassment.
We do what we can do.
Classy group of folks. Do you honestly think stalking a public official will change his/her interpretation of the law? Oh, well! I could not eat in peace? Well, okay then - abortion is great!
I dunno. Lots of people think that screaming at women and girls seeking health care might intimidate them into changing their minds. Well, ok, then — I’ll have my rapist’s baby. Shared custody with an abuser is great! So, it might be worth a try.
And how did you make the leap from protesting to “stalking”?
DP. I guess you didn't see the tweet from Shut Down DC.
Classic stalking.
No worries, though. We'll do our part too.
I may just be a "DC Industry Worker" who has multiple sightings of these conservative Justices. Even though I live nowhere near DC.
Time to flood their site. With sighting after sighting after sighting.
Anonymous
07/08/2022 20:54
Subject: SCOTUS Protection Request
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Kavanaugh had to leave by back door while dining at Morton's Steaks because of demonstrations at front. Poor whittle beer guzzler. Owner or manager was upset. I don't think he realizes that women generally choose the restaurant. Boycott Morton's and all restaurants that serve these six justices.
https://meaww.com/mortons-brett-kavanaugh-restaurant-protests?utm_source=smartnewsapp&utm_medium=articlelink&utm_campaign=575711
Try this with purported liberal Justices and you'll have Merrick Garland breathing down your neck.
Or, at the very least... a pre-dawn raid with CNN in tow.
And, of course.... Twitter allows this targeted harassment.
We do what we can do.
Classy group of folks. Do you honestly think stalking a public official will change his/her interpretation of the law? Oh, well! I could not eat in peace? Well, okay then - abortion is great!
I dunno. Lots of people think that screaming at women and girls seeking health care might intimidate them into changing their minds. Well, ok, then — I’ll have my rapist’s baby. Shared custody with an abuser is great! So, it might be worth a try.
And how did you make the leap from protesting to “stalking”?
Republican jurists have been very clear that screaming at people is protected constitutional speech.
Anonymous
07/08/2022 20:33
Subject: SCOTUS Protection Request
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Kavanaugh had to leave by back door while dining at Morton's Steaks because of demonstrations at front. Poor whittle beer guzzler. Owner or manager was upset. I don't think he realizes that women generally choose the restaurant. Boycott Morton's and all restaurants that serve these six justices.
https://meaww.com/mortons-brett-kavanaugh-restaurant-protests?utm_source=smartnewsapp&utm_medium=articlelink&utm_campaign=575711
Try this with purported liberal Justices and you'll have Merrick Garland breathing down your neck.
Or, at the very least... a pre-dawn raid with CNN in tow.
And, of course.... Twitter allows this targeted harassment.
We do what we can do.
Classy group of folks. Do you honestly think stalking a public official will change his/her interpretation of the law? Oh, well! I could not eat in peace? Well, okay then - abortion is great!
I dunno. Lots of people think that screaming at women and girls seeking health care might intimidate them into changing their minds. Well, ok, then — I’ll have my rapist’s baby. Shared custody with an abuser is great! So, it might be worth a try.
And how did you make the leap from protesting to “stalking”?
Anonymous
07/08/2022 20:24
Subject: SCOTUS Protection Request
Now I know never to eat at Morton’s.
Anonymous
07/08/2022 20:23
Subject: Re:SCOTUS Protection Request
Alexandra Petri satire:
Opinion: Sorry, but the Constitution contains no right to eat dinner
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/07/08/brett-kavanaugh-dinner-steakhouse-mortons-protest-satire/
The right to congregate and eat dinner is actually not to be found anywhere in the Constitution. I have been studying the Constitution very carefully, including the emanations of the penumbras, and I can see why people might think there was some inherent right to dinner. Eating seems so fundamental: Whether or not you want to have steak inside yourself seems like something you ought to be able to determine on your own behalf. Eating and chewing, alone or in the company of others, feels as though it ought to be up to the person most affected, and protected from abridgment of any kind, even by the states.
Opinion: Sorry, but the Constitution contains no right to eat dinner
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/07/08/brett-kavanaugh-dinner-steakhouse-mortons-protest-satire/
The right to congregate and eat dinner is actually not to be found anywhere in the Constitution. I have been studying the Constitution very carefully, including the emanations of the penumbras, and I can see why people might think there was some inherent right to dinner. Eating seems so fundamental: Whether or not you want to have steak inside yourself seems like something you ought to be able to determine on your own behalf. Eating and chewing, alone or in the company of others, feels as though it ought to be up to the person most affected, and protected from abridgment of any kind, even by the states.
Anonymous
07/08/2022 20:18
Subject: SCOTUS Protection Request
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Kavanaugh had to leave by back door while dining at Morton's Steaks because of demonstrations at front. Poor whittle beer guzzler. Owner or manager was upset. I don't think he realizes that women generally choose the restaurant. Boycott Morton's and all restaurants that serve these six justices.
https://meaww.com/mortons-brett-kavanaugh-restaurant-protests?utm_source=smartnewsapp&utm_medium=articlelink&utm_campaign=575711
Try this with purported liberal Justices and you'll have Merrick Garland breathing down your neck.
Or, at the very least... a pre-dawn raid with CNN in tow.
And, of course.... Twitter allows this targeted harassment.
We do what we can do.
Classy group of folks. Do you honestly think stalking a public official will change his/her interpretation of the law? Oh, well! I could not eat in peace? Well, okay then - abortion is great!