Reply to Naviance is wrong

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "Naviance is wrong"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]To build on black parent's snark - he/she is somewhat right.  White/Asian unhooked students are chosen for the number of hoops they are willing to jump through.  After they enter the selective college, somehow they must decompress and lose that mentality, or they won't be enter the top echelon of society, which is what the top schools give you an option for.  I suspect this is part of the reason private school students do better.  Generational wealth allowed them to achieve without grovelling.

Not sure what the solution is, but I have been seeing this problem for a while.[/quote]

Your point assumes the problem.  Who says they need to decompress or lose any mentality?  It's a ridiculous stereotype that kids with achievements are necessarily drones or sheep.  They simply aren't.  This (and the accompanying racist meme that Asian kids are robots) are just the excuse you make when some kids does better than yours.  "Oh well, they must be a drone/robot/sheep."  It's pathetic.[/quote]

+1. We thought DC’s “passion” was too all-consuming for DC and the family. Mid-high school, we forced DC to downshift to fewer days. But DC’s talent and passion were still there and they’re the reason DC got into a top Ivy.

The top colleges see thousands of packaged kids every year, and they can spot them a mile off. Real passion and talent are identifiable, because a kid can’t jump through the so-called “hoops” of awards and amazing recs without them.

This sour grapes about sheep and drones is pathetic. Some pps here sound like they think their kids have a “right” to admission at a top college. Nobody has this “right.”

[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics