Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "WH correspondents dinner: Michelle wolf yay or nay?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I just watched it and I didn't see her mocking the appearance of Kellyanne or Sarah. [/quote] Right? I read a bunch of people complaining about her mocking SHS's appearance, and I didn't hear it at all. Maybe they don't know that "a perfect smoky eye" is actually a compliment? Or they just assume that because they would mock SHS's appearance, that must be what Wolf was doing? It's projection or something, because it wasn't in the routine. [/quote] Agreed. Michelle Wolf even responded to this via tweet to Maggie Haberman: https://twitter.com/michelleisawolf/status/990483756883628032[/quote] Yup. She accomplished the comedian's equivalent of Sherman's March on that room. She burned down the house and many in the media are pissed off that Wolfe had the temerity to show that Media Emperors truly have no clothes. She called out their complicity and the money they are all making off Trump. The last two minutes of her act were a full voiced trashing of the MSM, including CNN and Fox. The entire point of the comedy sketch at the WHCD is that it celebrates the 1st Amendment. People from the Administration come and have to taking their lumps. Unfortunately for SHS and this White House is that they provide a wealth of material due to their unethical behavior and hypocrisy. They could easily give Michelle Wolfe less material by acting like normal human beings with an ounce of morality. PS - Maggie Haberman's defense of SHS is PATHETIC. SHS is a known leaker and source for many "anonymous Administration official" news articles. Anyone in the media defending SHS can safely be assumed to be relying on SHS as a source. It's so, so, SO pathetic to watch them grovel. [/quote] Exactly. I also think the Aunt Lydia comparison was pretty apt. She's the woman doing the dirty work for the patriarchy. She's not the only one, but she's the one the press has to deal with. They are being incredibly hypocritical and cowardly. Trump's attacks on the MSM work because the 24hour news networks destroyed journalism.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics