Reply to 38F - OLD apps: not getting any matches

Forum Index » Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)

Reply to "38F - OLD apps: not getting any matches "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]38 is pretty old in the eyes of most men in the age group she is looking at. She needs to up the age to mid 50s.[/quote]
Ew. I wish the gross old men would stop trying to troll op. [/quote]

Right? OP is a million times better off being single than with an old man.  Old men = baggage, liabilities, and a reminder that death is imminent.  Avoid them. 
[/quote]

But beggars can't be choosers, so...[/quote]
Who's begging? If the options are alone or be with a nasty old saggy ball uneducated misogynistic short loser, maybe it's still better to be alone. [/quote]

If you're a 38 year old woman and you don't have kids yet and you want to, then yes you are a beggar.

The best men are taken, and many of the available ones will choose someone younger than you.

So yeah you can be alone. Or you can make some compromises. How badly do you want kids?[/quote]
Why would you want to compromise on the FATHER OF YOUR CHILDREN? [b] [Because you're out of time and out of optimum choices][/b]
You are so delusional. You'd be better off compromising on your dating partner or husband. But the father of your children? Why are we compromising on the DNA that literally creates another human?[b] [You are delusional. You think a 38yo woman can be uncompromising AND still have children. She can't. She will have to compromise in some way.][/b]
No, do not date some old fugly man just so you can have kids. 
No, do not date some alcoholic who can't keep a job man just so you can have kids. 
No, do not date someone lacking brain cells just so you can have kids. 
No, do not date someone abusive or mean just so you can have kids. [b][Who said anything about marrying someone fugly/alcoholic/stupid/abusive? Only you. Because you are trying to frame the debate in a dishonest way. She's not going to get the best possible guy she could have gotten in an ideal world when she was 25. But that doesn't mean her choice is down to "fugly/alcoholic/stupid/abusive or nothing".][/b]

I really think you do not know the reality of today when you are encouraging women to settle for subpar men [i]just[/i] to have kids. I mean, it's actually so obvious that you're telling women to settle for men [i]like you,[/i] but clearly no one wants that. 
[b][The reality of today for a woman of 38 who wants to have kids is that she won't get the same guy she could have gotten 10-15 years ago. That is a fact. I'm sorry you hate it, but it is still a fact. And hey if you want to personalize it, it's actually so obvious that you are trying to convince other women not to settle because you want to sabotage them so that there are more men available for you.][/b]

[/quote][/quote]
Lol! You are so delusional. I'm happily married. I encourage women not to settle for losers so they don't end up like many dcum posters on here - whinging about how their man doesn't lift a finger, yells at them, cheats on them, loses his job, doesn't take care of his own children, etc etc. Being pickier to start instead of settling will avoid a lot of these. Encouraging women to settle for one of these losers just so you think you and your ilk might have a chance doesn't actually better OPs situation. You aren't giving advice in good faith.

OP would be better off using a sperm donor, getting to pick exact height, IQ, education status, etc and then find a man for companionship if she so chooses. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics