Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "Maybe it would be a good thing if Trump limited international students at t100 schools?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Wouldn't it be a good thing if the top US schools educated and prepared more US students? Is what's happening at harvard a blessing in disguise? Maybe the government should limit the number of international students at all top schools. Getting in and the cost of attending is just too much. [/quote] International students are a major source of funding. They are almost all full pay (sometimes at higher rates than Americans) so they subsidize financial aid as well as their programs of study. If the government were paying for universities - as it could and arguably should, so that everyone could have a low-cost or free education - then maybe we could talk about it. But as it is, limiting international students would just reduce what the university can afford to do for Americans. [/quote] I always love this argument - the rich foreigners are "full pay" - as if full pay is a good thing given the outrageous cost of a college education in the US. This is how you people get around admitting the middle class kids - just admit a few poor students and mix them in with the elitist snobs that can afford "full pay" and you're good![/quote] The “foreign students subsidize US students”talking point is so funny because it is basically these schools admitting that “need blind” and “meets full need” is all BS. They can afford to be “need blind” for the 3/4 of their students from the US because they aren’t need blind for the 25% that come from somewhere else. In other words, they aren’t really need blind. The ridiculous thing is that there are plenty of US students who would happily fill the 25% if the school not being need blind is part of the deal. Of course, most of those students wouldn’t make the colleges’ diversity stats look better, which is the real reason they wouldn’t do it. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics