Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "No, test optional isn’t the reason your kid didn’t get in."
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It's a ZERO SUM GAME. If a lower score kid got lucky and got in with TO when otherwise wouldn't have even applied, there's another kid with higher score didn't get in. [/quote] Exactly. [/quote] Just because one kid had a higher test score doesn't mean they were overall a better applicant. [/quote] Higher score kids are usually overall a better applicant. [/quote] Where was this study researched? [/quote] MIT research and [b]UC research[/b] but you can easily see. Check out the test scores for competitive elites schools and mediocre schools. Big difference in test scores. Why do you think it's that? [/quote] And yet UC application has removed all SAT/ACT scores from consideration[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
