Reply to Why do people still think that these ferocious dog breeds are safe and should be tolerated?

Forum Index » Pets

Reply to "Why do people still think that these ferocious dog breeds are safe and should be tolerated?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Pit Bulls are inherently dangerous and there is no need for them.  You can get the same level of affection and devotion and companionship from dogs that (i) do not have the strength of jaw tenacity and (ii) were not bred for the specific purpose of fighting other animals.  Dogs are highly adaptable creatures given the # of chromosones and the large litters.  Just get a different kind of dog.[/quote]

Once again - spewing stereotypes. And once again - I saw prove it. Prove they are inherently dangerous (and no, personal anecdotes and over-hyped media reports don't count).

And prove they were bred just for fighting (although, I guess first you need to clarify what a pitbull is since several breeds tend to be referred to as pitbulls). And prove/explain "jaw tenacity". FYI: the "lockjaw" myth was disrupted earlier in the thread. [/quote]

I too am curious to hear the answers to these questions and for people to back up these allegations. [/quote]

they can test jaw strength.  there are statistics showing the # of severe maulings that come from pit-bull type breeds.  not sure what more facts you need.

if they tested jaw strengths and found that a pit bull has X PSI, which is greater than a wolf and greater than any other domestic dog breed, would that change your opinion?[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics