Reply to Wallstreet Feeder Schools (Per Capita)

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "Wallstreet Feeder Schools (Per Capita)"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Phrases people use that let me know they are unintelligent:

Anything racist
"I'm Just Saying"
"For All Intensive Purposes"
"I did my own research about vaccines"
"It is what it is"
"Snowflake", "Crotchfruit" or anything similar
"Lower Ivy"

I'm just saying....

[/quote]

Clever.
I will add: "Columbia and UChicago are better than Stanford, MIT and Yale"[/quote]

Columbia is #2 according to USNews. You may not agree with US News. It shows reasonable minds see Columbia as #2. [/quote]

Columbia is a safety to HYP…stop kidding yourselves [/quote]

Princeton is a safety to Yale, Yale is a safety to Harvard. I don’t see what’s so different between Columbia and HYP.[/quote]

There is no significant difference, and it's really silly to call any of these schools safeties.  There are plenty of reasons to choose Columbia (or Dartmouth, or even Brown) over any of the HYP schools, and to pretend otherwise is ridiculous.

But this thread is about finance placement.  It doesn't matter how many kids Columbia sends to IB analyst roles each year, a similar kid at Harvard (or Wharton) will have more opportunities than one at Columbia.  Hell, these days I might even add Stanford to this list since they have some West Coast buyside options that don't really exist for the usual east coast undergrad target schools.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics