Reply to “We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled," Justice Alito writes in an initial majority draft

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "“We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled," Justice Alito writes in an initial majority draft"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Have we discussed a right-wing journalist naming a random SCOTUS clerk as the leaker based on nothing but pure speculation (because she has a gender studies degree)? I think the person who leaked should be fired/disbarred but I'm not sure we should be naming random people as the leaker.[/quote]
I think this is one more sign the leaker is from the Thomas/Alito camp rather than one of the liberal justices.  This is the second clerk of a liberal justice he has named as the leaker in just two days, and he is clearly trying to deflect attention from the conservative justices. [/quote]
Which ahole is naming these clerks?[/quote]

Just assume they all are leakers and send them off to leftist NGOs to work for $50k a year and a $10 signing bonus. [/quote]

Including Ginni?[/quote]

Ginni is leaking scotus pre-trial briefing drafts to the press? [/quote]

DP.  Very possibly. [/quote]

[b]I missed it, which papers were leaked? [/b]

White and case needs to know since we don’t hire unethical scotus clerks. And neither do our clients. Especially if we’re dishing out $500k sign on bonuses.[/quote]
Huh?  You know what thread you’re in, right?[/quote]

Ginni leaked some scotus opinions to the press? When ? [/quote]

It was just published the other day. So it must have been in the past month.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics