Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Soccer
Reply to "Pipeline to ECNL"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Armour girls and boys is not 80% Pipeline. More like 5-10 total players for boys and roughly the same amount for girls across all of the age groups. It’s predominantly SAC players (probably 70%?) with a handful of other players mixed in from outside Columbia/Ellicott City area. I’ve heard Pipeline isn’t going to ECNL b/c it’s being sued by Coppermine for conversion.[/quote] The lawsuit with coppermine wouldn't deter them in my opinion...If anything it would encourage. They need to boost their income. They're unable to support the DA financially. ECNL would keep their players in-house in pipeline jerseys and allow them to market towards any player regardless of their preference to play HS or not.[/quote] The lawsuit is a complete joke and should not have an effect on anything,, other than make Coppermine management look like idiots suing over 10 year olds.[/quote] They both look dumb. Pipeline 08s were weak so they poached a stronger side. Nothing wrong with competition but essentially paying somebody to provide personal or proprietary information is weak even if legal. Does not reflect well. They look like they are trying to do the same thing with younger age groups. Looking at their sides, they like big kids who run fast. Arlington North.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics