Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "GA Case"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]All of these revelations about Fani and her lover came about from Mike Roman's legal defense team. Interesting that the GA Grand Jury recommended NOT indicting Roman, but Fani just had to have her way. Karma is a bit*h. [/quote] Wait wut? Please site this.[/quote] "Notably, Roman was the only one of the 19 people Willis charged who had not been recommended for indictment by a special grand jury which spent eight months investigating election subversion efforts in Georgia after the 2020 election." https://www.ajc.com/politics/breaking-filing-alleges-improper-relationship-between-fulton-da-top-trump-prosecutor/A2N2OWCM7FFWJBQH2ORAK2BKMQ/#:~:text=Notably%2C%20Roman%20was%20the%20only,jury%20handed%20up%20criminal%20charges.[/quote] As the director of Election Day operations for the Trump campaign, I'm curious to know why the grand jury didn't indict him among all of the others. What were they told or not told to lead them to make that decision? His lawyer doesn't seem to be going in that direction, currently. Instead she's raising this already-rejected objection on the basis of "fairness" which is more usually a civil rather than criminal argument. The alleged affair isn't good optics for Willis. This motion isn't good optics for Roman.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics