Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Sarah Fraser Show / Little Pink Monsters Blogger"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I feel like with kanes anxiety he’d have had good life insurance with girls as the beneficiaries. There is no way she could not be working if she didn’t have those trusts to pull from (not that she shouldn’t pull from them!) [/quote] If there are trusts, they wouldn’t support Natasha or her son. [/quote] Wouldn’t she also get child support from her second husband? [/quote] CS doesn’t support the mother and certainly doesn’t pay for 100% of the child’s needs. No one knows what he does, their custody arrangement, or what CS would possibly be for the son.[/quote] Well it’s clear she living entirely off of support from ex-husbands which would lean towards child support. I lose a lot of respect for her here.[/quote] This. She’s a pathetic professional leech. She’s never managed to do more than live-off men despite being educated with a college degree. Now she’s living off the life insurance of her ex-husband which she says he doubled just a couple of months before his death and it was already plenty before he doubled it. It’s impossible to respect her, but having been married to a narcissist, I say f him. I’m glad she “won” in the end even if there was a high price to pay which shows all over her haggard face thinning hair. I’d respect her if she was ever self-sufficient, but she just jumps from one husband to the next like it’s a job. The only reason she hasn’t remarried is there’s no financial need to do so. I really hope her girls don’t follow her example. [/quote] Where are you getting that she's living off the life insurance? There's NO way Kane left that to her. It's 100% all to the girls, I bet you, and I'm sure it was set up by his high-priced legal team so that the disbursements have to be closely monitored. I mean, my uncle had that done and he wasn't even well-off like Kane and didn't have fancy lawyers, either. He just knew that there needed to be safeguards in place so that his exwife didn't blow through the money that went to his kids after he found out he had terminal cancer. [/quote] This nasty person thinks that providing a home, feeding, and taking care of Kane's daughters is living the high life off of his life insurance :roll: [/quote] Seriously! Some of these people truly must not understand how much trauma this family has been through. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics