Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Bannon indicted"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Guilty on both count![/quote] Of course! That's what happens when you aren't allowed to mount a defense. SC should overturn it as there's precedence from way back during Nixon's presidency. I don't like Bannon but I don't like kangaroo courts more. We have to be VERY careful or it will come back to bite us as a party. This makes me very nervous. Bannon is not easily intimidated. For those speaking about Hillary, she walked into a much friendlier situation.[/quote] Was Bannon somehow blocked from a defense? My understanding is that he just chose not to put on a defense (which is his right). Let’s review. He was subpoenaed by Congress to testify. He refused. He was hauled to court because he refused. The prosecution explained why he needed to appear in front of Congress. His defense had nothing to say. He lost. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics