Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Heard somewhere: Jail has been sentenced to Steve Bannon.

Can you translate this to English and provide a source? Sentencing isn't until October

Go find a sense of humor.

How about you guys back up what you way instead?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Guilty on both count!

Of course! That's what happens when you aren't allowed to mount a defense. SC should overturn it as there's precedence from way back during Nixon's presidency.

I don't like Bannon but I don't like kangaroo courts more. We have to be VERY careful or it will come back to bite us as a party. This makes me very nervous. Bannon is not easily intimidated.

For those speaking about Hillary, she walked into a much friendlier situation.

Was Bannon somehow blocked from a defense? My understanding is that he just chose not to put on a defense (which is his right).

Let’s review. He was subpoenaed by Congress to testify. He refused. He was hauled to court because he refused. The prosecution explained why he needed to appear in front of Congress. His defense had nothing to say. He lost.

There was no point. The judge at first disallowed the letter from Trump, then realized he was up the creek without a paddle due to precedence. So he kinda sorta allowed it. Bannon was denied every request he had. So why try to mount a defense. They will appeal, the appeal will be turned down (Obama judge) and then we'll see if the SC takes the case. Max sentence is 2 years, min 2 months. My guess is between now and October they will think long and hard about the consequences of playing hardball. Election year and all.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Guilty on both count!

Of course! That's what happens when you aren't allowed to mount a defense. SC should overturn it as there's precedence from way back during Nixon's presidency.

I don't like Bannon but I don't like kangaroo courts more. We have to be VERY careful or it will come back to bite us as a party. This makes me very nervous. Bannon is not easily intimidated.

For those speaking about Hillary, she walked into a much friendlier situation.

BS.

+1
I’m so sick of Republicans posing as Democrats.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Heard somewhere: Jail has been sentenced to Steve Bannon.

Can you translate this to English and provide a source? Sentencing isn't until October

Go find a sense of humor.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Guilty on both count!

Of course! That's what happens when you aren't allowed to mount a defense. SC should overturn it as there's precedence from way back during Nixon's presidency.

I don't like Bannon but I don't like kangaroo courts more. We have to be VERY careful or it will come back to bite us as a party. This makes me very nervous. Bannon is not easily intimidated.

For those speaking about Hillary, she walked into a much friendlier situation.

Was Bannon somehow blocked from a defense? My understanding is that he just chose not to put on a defense (which is his right).

Let’s review. He was subpoenaed by Congress to testify. He refused. He was hauled to court because he refused. The prosecution explained why he needed to appear in front of Congress. His defense had nothing to say. He lost.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Heard somewhere: Jail has been sentenced to Steve Bannon.

Can you translate this to English and provide a source? Sentencing isn't until October

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Guilty on both count!

Of course! That's what happens when you aren't allowed to mount a defense. SC should overturn it as there's precedence from way back during Nixon's presidency.

I don't like Bannon but I don't like kangaroo courts more. We have to be VERY careful or it will come back to bite us as a party. This makes me very nervous. Bannon is not easily intimidated.

For those speaking about Hillary, she walked into a much friendlier situation.

BS.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Guilty on both count!

Of course! That's what happens when you aren't allowed to mount a defense. SC should overturn it as there's precedence from way back during Nixon's presidency.

I don't like Bannon but I don't like kangaroo courts more. We have to be VERY careful or it will come back to bite us as a party. This makes me very nervous. Bannon is not easily intimidated.

For those speaking about Hillary, she walked into a much friendlier situation.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Guilty on both count!

Of course! That's what happens when you aren't allowed to mount a defense. SC should overturn it as there's precedence from way back during Nixon's presidency.

I don't like Bannon but I don't like kangaroo courts more. We have to be VERY careful or it will come back to bite us as a party. This makes me very nervous. Bannon is not easily intimidated.

For those speaking about Hillary, she walked into a much friendlier situation.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Guilty on both count!

Of course! That's what happens when you aren't allowed to mount a defense. SC should overturn it as there's precedence from way back during Nixon's presidency.

I don't like Bannon but I don't like kangaroo courts more. We have to be VERY careful or it will come back to bite us as a party. This makes me very nervous. Bannon is not easily intimidated.

For those speaking about Hillary, she walked into a much friendlier situation.

Anonymous wrote:Heard somewhere: Jail has been sentenced to Steve Bannon.

Anonymous wrote:Guilty on both count!

Anonymous wrote:Imagine if Hillary Clinton blew off the Benghazi committee like Bannon blew off the 1/6 committee. The same people defending Bannon would have wanted to lock her up.