Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)
Reply to "SAHMs that never return to workforce?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]You should do you. The value that you add to your family and kids is difficult to measure - but it's significant. Society should value it more. [/quote] Who cares what "society" thinks. The value is entirely maintained within the family system - it's not like "society" reaps some benefit from this decision. But there is no need for external validation, is there? [/quote] Society absolutely benefits from this decision.[/quote] With women staying home indefinitely? I don't think so. It papers over holes in our social infrastructure but my life isn't any better because someone decides not to work ever again. I still think it's a totally fine choice to make, and that if you have the luxury of being able to make that choice then cheers to you and to your family![/quote] Just because you can't see what these people are doing to benefit your life doesn't mean they aren't. I don't see you doing anything to benefit them either, but I'm sure your paid labor has some social value beyond the economic. Similarly their unpaid labor has both social and economic value. If you suddenly removed every SAHP from society, what do you image would happen? You note that they "paper[] over holes in our social infrastructure" as if that were a minor thing easily fixed by ... what? Capitalism? Socialism? If every one of them were required to enter the paid workforce tomorrow, you really think nothing bad would come of that? Read some feminist critiques of Marx as a starting point. An economic model that fails to include the unpaid labor in society is obviously deficient, as is failing to recognize the inequality of pay across diverse workers. Similarly a failure to include non-bankable benefits of a variety of social roles is tunnel vision over-emphasizing currency as a measure of life and society. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics