Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)
Reply to "Cogat and NNAt 2021 Scores Sharing thread"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]More than half of the kids in AAP were not in pool. This means none of the subscores were 132 or higher. My schools AART encourages parents to refer any kid marked as LII with a 120+ CogAT composite. Most kids in that profile get accepted. [/quote] to replace 1/3 of the kids who are already in pool? [/quote] Tracking (which is what advanced math is) works best when done based on what kids already know (their aptitude) not when done based on their ability (what the NNAT and CoGAT purport to measure). So why not let the high achieving LLII kid with a 120+ composite in if they clearly know their stuff?[/quote] It is "amazing" if 1/3 of the >140 kids may get rejected/replaced from the APP program. [/quote] Why increase the cutoff to 140 if you still plan to reject 1/3 of them? It didn’t even make sense when they rejected 1/3 when the cutoff was 132. Can anyone please explain. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
