Anonymous wrote:Isn't that the teacher who prepares most of the work samples?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just surprised how much weight the teacher's comments weigh in the whole process.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:to replace 1/3 of the kids who are already in pool?Anonymous wrote:More than half of the kids in AAP were not in pool. This means none of the subscores were 132 or higher. My schools AART encourages parents to refer any kid marked as LII with a 120+ CogAT composite. Most kids in that profile get accepted.
Tracking (which is what advanced math is) works best when done based on what kids already know (their aptitude) not when done based on their ability (what the NNAT and CoGAT purport to measure). So why not let the high achieving LLII kid with a 120+ composite in if they clearly know their stuff?
Not just that, work samples are important too.
Anonymous wrote:It is "amazing" if 1/3 of the >140 kids may get rejected/replaced from the APP program.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:to replace 1/3 of the kids who are already in pool?Anonymous wrote:More than half of the kids in AAP were not in pool. This means none of the subscores were 132 or higher. My schools AART encourages parents to refer any kid marked as LII with a 120+ CogAT composite. Most kids in that profile get accepted.
Tracking (which is what advanced math is) works best when done based on what kids already know (their aptitude) not when done based on their ability (what the NNAT and CoGAT purport to measure). So why not let the high achieving LLII kid with a 120+ composite in if they clearly know their stuff?
Isn't that the teacher who prepares most of the work samples?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just surprised how much weight the teacher's comments weigh in the whole process.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:to replace 1/3 of the kids who are already in pool?Anonymous wrote:More than half of the kids in AAP were not in pool. This means none of the subscores were 132 or higher. My schools AART encourages parents to refer any kid marked as LII with a 120+ CogAT composite. Most kids in that profile get accepted.
Tracking (which is what advanced math is) works best when done based on what kids already know (their aptitude) not when done based on their ability (what the NNAT and CoGAT purport to measure). So why not let the high achieving LLII kid with a 120+ composite in if they clearly know their stuff?
Not just that, work samples are important too.
It is "amazing" if 1/3 of the >140 kids may get rejected/replaced from the APP program.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:to replace 1/3 of the kids who are already in pool?Anonymous wrote:More than half of the kids in AAP were not in pool. This means none of the subscores were 132 or higher. My schools AART encourages parents to refer any kid marked as LII with a 120+ CogAT composite. Most kids in that profile get accepted.
Tracking (which is what advanced math is) works best when done based on what kids already know (their aptitude) not when done based on their ability (what the NNAT and CoGAT purport to measure). So why not let the high achieving LLII kid with a 120+ composite in if they clearly know their stuff?
Anonymous wrote:Just surprised how much weight the teacher's comments weigh in the whole process.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:to replace 1/3 of the kids who are already in pool?Anonymous wrote:More than half of the kids in AAP were not in pool. This means none of the subscores were 132 or higher. My schools AART encourages parents to refer any kid marked as LII with a 120+ CogAT composite. Most kids in that profile get accepted.
Tracking (which is what advanced math is) works best when done based on what kids already know (their aptitude) not when done based on their ability (what the NNAT and CoGAT purport to measure). So why not let the high achieving LLII kid with a 120+ composite in if they clearly know their stuff?
Just surprised how much weight the teacher's comments weigh in the whole process.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:to replace 1/3 of the kids who are already in pool?Anonymous wrote:More than half of the kids in AAP were not in pool. This means none of the subscores were 132 or higher. My schools AART encourages parents to refer any kid marked as LII with a 120+ CogAT composite. Most kids in that profile get accepted.
Tracking (which is what advanced math is) works best when done based on what kids already know (their aptitude) not when done based on their ability (what the NNAT and CoGAT purport to measure). So why not let the high achieving LLII kid with a 120+ composite in if they clearly know their stuff?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:to replace 1/3 of the kids who are already in pool?Anonymous wrote:More than half of the kids in AAP were not in pool. This means none of the subscores were 132 or higher. My schools AART encourages parents to refer any kid marked as LII with a 120+ CogAT composite. Most kids in that profile get accepted.
Tracking (which is what advanced math is) works best when done based on what kids already know (their aptitude) not when done based on their ability (what the NNAT and CoGAT purport to measure). So why not let the high achieving LLII kid with a 120+ composite in if they clearly know their stuff?
Anonymous wrote:to replace 1/3 of the kids who are already in pool?Anonymous wrote:More than half of the kids in AAP were not in pool. This means none of the subscores were 132 or higher. My schools AART encourages parents to refer any kid marked as LII with a 120+ CogAT composite. Most kids in that profile get accepted.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do you mean Cogat composite is most important?Anonymous wrote:Any ability profile with higher scores is better than A profile with lower scores.
Yes, the cut off is based on composite. A Kid who barely meets the cutoff in only one subsection is a red flag. At least 2 subsections have to be well above cutoff with the third subsection not too less in the range on 100 or so but anywhere above 125.
So if this year's cut-off is 140, you're saying that only one section above 140 would be a red flag? They need at least two sections in the mid-140's or higher? That seems crazy.
Anonymous wrote:More than half of the kids in AAP were not in pool. This means none of the subscores were 132 or higher. My schools AART encourages parents to refer any kid marked as LII with a 120+ CogAT composite. Most kids in that profile get accepted.
to replace 1/3 of the kids who are already in pool?Anonymous wrote:More than half of the kids in AAP were not in pool. This means none of the subscores were 132 or higher. My schools AART encourages parents to refer any kid marked as LII with a 120+ CogAT composite. Most kids in that profile get accepted.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do you mean Cogat composite is most important?Anonymous wrote:Any ability profile with higher scores is better than A profile with lower scores.
Yes, the cut off is based on composite. A Kid who barely meets the cutoff in only one subsection is a red flag. At least 2 subsections have to be well above cutoff with the third subsection not too less in the range on 100 or so but anywhere above 125.