Reply to Trump's 25 Sexual Assault Victims Thread

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Trump's 25 Sexual Assault Victims Thread"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]OP here. Yes, Boyne is the first accuser for whom it's basically she-said-he-said.

There are no decades-old sexual misconduct lawsuits, for example from 1993 (Ivana) or 1997 (Harth). There are no witnesses or friends the accuser confided in decades before Trump ran for president, unlike Leeds, Anderson, and Harth.

None of this means Boyne is lying, though. Also, it seems consistent with Trump's p--ssy-grabbing behavior.[/quote]

Convenient that she came out with her story a week after the Access Hollywood tape was released. 
Coincidental?  Of course not.  
She is an opportunist.  [/quote]

What exactly did she get from coming out with her story? Was she paid? No.
[/quote]

Well, Lisa Bloom was her attorney, so she could have been paid. 
And, I am sure her health food business didn't suffer as a result of the publicity.  [/quote]

You can't just make stuff up about how she "could have been paid."

Proof, please. Or stop with the fantasies.[/quote]

Oh, please.  Are you the person who keeps claiming Ivana Trump was “paid” to recant her testimony?  There is ZERO proof of that, yet you (or someone here) keeps announcing it like it’s fact.  So take your own advice and stop with the fantasies when it’s convenient to further your narrative.   :roll: 
-DP[/quote]

I don't see how you can even dispute this. No, Ivana wasn't "paid" to recant her testimony. But, Trump threatened to [b]take away $25million[/b] from Ivana if she kept talking about the rape.

As described above (Day 2 of this thread), Ivana and Donnie's 1992 divorce settlement had, among other elements, (1) a gag clause on Ivana (only) that prohibited Ivana from talking about their marriage, and (2) a total of about $25 million for Ivana. During the trial, Ivana gave a sworn deposition that Trump raped her.

Also as described above, shortly after the divorce settlement, Ivana started to write a veiled novel about their marriage. Trump sued Ivana for violating the gag clause in the divorce agreement, and he argued that this invalidated the whole divorce agreement, including the $25 million for Ivana. So, Ivana would have lost the $25 million in the divorce settlement agreement. Trump pursued this all the way to the NY State Supreme Court.

And yes, I'll follow you through this thread and point out your lies as they materialize....[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics