Reply to The Facts About the Districtwide Boundary Analysis

Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)

Reply to "The Facts About the Districtwide Boundary Analysis"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The Clarksburg lawsuit is for all residents who don’t support the BOE changes to boundary. [/quote]

Then apparently there are only 3 residents who don't support the boundary changes in the upcounty boundary study.[/quote]

Sounds about right.[/quote]

No there are 7,000 in a FB group that don't support boundary changes.  I'm one of them.[/quote]

So first of all, not everyone in that Facebook group is there because they oppose the boundary analysis.

Second, the lawsuit in the top PP is about the upcounty boundary study - the one related to the August 2020 opening of a new Seneca Valley High School building. Are you saying that you don't think that MCPS should have changed any boundaries for that? They should have just opened the new building, with the existing boundaries?[/quote]

Boundaries needed to be changed because SV opened.  They didn't need to take kids halfway across the county though to Neelsville.
[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics