Anonymous
01/22/2020 11:54
Subject: The Facts About the Districtwide Boundary Analysis
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
No there are 7,000 in a FB group that don't support boundary changes. I'm one of them.
So first of all, not everyone in that Facebook group is there because they oppose the boundary analysis.
Second, the lawsuit in the top PP is about the upcounty boundary study - the one related to the August 2020 opening of a new Seneca Valley High School building. Are you saying that you don't think that MCPS should have changed any boundaries for that? They should have just opened the new building, with the existing boundaries?
Boundaries needed to be changed because SV opened. They didn't need to take kids halfway across the county though to Neelsville.
Are you the PP? So actually, you do support boundary changes. Just not boundary changes you don't like.
Also you must not live in the upcounty, because nobody would describe a trip from southern Clarksburg or northern Germantown, to northern Germantown, as "halfway across the county."
You must not live upcounty because Cabin Branch is North Clarksburg/border of Frederick County and Neelsville is closer to Gaithersburg border than to Germantown.
Anonymous
01/22/2020 10:47
Subject: The Facts About the Districtwide Boundary Analysis
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
No there are 7,000 in a FB group that don't support boundary changes. I'm one of them.
So first of all, not everyone in that Facebook group is there because they oppose the boundary analysis.
Second, the lawsuit in the top PP is about the upcounty boundary study - the one related to the August 2020 opening of a new Seneca Valley High School building. Are you saying that you don't think that MCPS should have changed any boundaries for that? They should have just opened the new building, with the existing boundaries?
Boundaries needed to be changed because SV opened. They didn't need to take kids halfway across the county though to Neelsville.
Are you the PP? So actually, you do support boundary changes. Just not boundary changes you don't like.
Also you must not live in the upcounty, because nobody would describe a trip from southern Clarksburg or northern Germantown, to northern Germantown, as "halfway across the county."
Anonymous
01/22/2020 10:42
Subject: The Facts About the Districtwide Boundary Analysis
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Clarksburg lawsuit is for all residents who don’t support the BOE changes to boundary.
Then apparently there are only 3 residents who don't support the boundary changes in the upcounty boundary study.
Sounds about right.
No there are 7,000 in a FB group that don't support boundary changes. I'm one of them.
That's less than 1% of MoCo's population.
Enough to make a difference. Two or three parent groups with a tenth of that number made a difference in Fairfax County.
Anonymous
01/22/2020 08:40
Subject: The Facts About the Districtwide Boundary Analysis
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Clarksburg lawsuit is for all residents who don’t support the BOE changes to boundary.
Then apparently there are only 3 residents who don't support the boundary changes in the upcounty boundary study.
Sounds about right.
No there are 7,000 in a FB group that don't support boundary changes. I'm one of them.
So first of all, not everyone in that Facebook group is there because they oppose the boundary analysis.
Second, the lawsuit in the top PP is about the upcounty boundary study - the one related to the August 2020 opening of a new Seneca Valley High School building. Are you saying that you don't think that MCPS should have changed any boundaries for that? They should have just opened the new building, with the existing boundaries?
Boundaries needed to be changed because SV opened. They didn't need to take kids halfway across the county though to Neelsville.
Anonymous
01/22/2020 08:30
Subject: The Facts About the Districtwide Boundary Analysis
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Clarksburg lawsuit is for all residents who don’t support the BOE changes to boundary.
Then apparently there are only 3 residents who don't support the boundary changes in the upcounty boundary study.
Sounds about right.
No there are 7,000 in a FB group that don't support boundary changes. I'm one of them.
That's less than 1% of MoCo's population.
6997 Russian bots
It's not a laughing matter. The BOE is harvesting spleens!
Anonymous
01/22/2020 06:41
Subject: The Facts About the Districtwide Boundary Analysis
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Clarksburg lawsuit is for all residents who don’t support the BOE changes to boundary.
Then apparently there are only 3 residents who don't support the boundary changes in the upcounty boundary study.
Sounds about right.
No there are 7,000 in a FB group that don't support boundary changes. I'm one of them.
That's less than 1% of MoCo's population.
6997 Russian bots
Anonymous
01/21/2020 21:30
Subject: The Facts About the Districtwide Boundary Analysis
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Clarksburg lawsuit is for all residents who don’t support the BOE changes to boundary.
Then apparently there are only 3 residents who don't support the boundary changes in the upcounty boundary study.
Sounds about right.
No there are 7,000 in a FB group that don't support boundary changes. I'm one of them.
That's less than 1% of MoCo's population.
Anonymous
01/21/2020 21:02
Subject: The Facts About the Districtwide Boundary Analysis
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Clarksburg lawsuit is for all residents who don’t support the BOE changes to boundary.
Then apparently there are only 3 residents who don't support the boundary changes in the upcounty boundary study.
Sounds about right.
No there are 7,000 in a FB group that don't support boundary changes. I'm one of them.
So first of all, not everyone in that Facebook group is there because they oppose the boundary analysis.
Second, the lawsuit in the top PP is about the upcounty boundary study - the one related to the August 2020 opening of a new Seneca Valley High School building. Are you saying that you don't think that MCPS should have changed any boundaries for that? They should have just opened the new building, with the existing boundaries?
Anonymous
01/21/2020 20:54
Subject: The Facts About the Districtwide Boundary Analysis
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Clarksburg lawsuit is for all residents who don’t support the BOE changes to boundary.
Then apparently there are only 3 residents who don't support the boundary changes in the upcounty boundary study.
Sounds about right.
No there are 7,000 in a FB group that don't support boundary changes. I'm one of them.
Anonymous
01/21/2020 16:11
Subject: The Facts About the Districtwide Boundary Analysis
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Clarksburg lawsuit is for all residents who don’t support the BOE changes to boundary.
Then apparently there are only 3 residents who don't support the boundary changes in the upcounty boundary study.
Sounds about right.
Anonymous
01/21/2020 12:17
Subject: The Facts About the Districtwide Boundary Analysis
Anonymous wrote:The Clarksburg lawsuit is for all residents who don’t support the BOE changes to boundary.
Then apparently there are only 3 residents who don't support the boundary changes in the upcounty boundary study.
Anonymous
01/21/2020 12:13
Subject: The Facts About the Districtwide Boundary Analysis
The Clarksburg lawsuit is for all residents who don’t support the BOE changes to boundary.
Anonymous
01/21/2020 11:20
Subject: The Facts About the Districtwide Boundary Analysis
You guys, the thread for the lawsuit about Clarksburg is here: https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/849654.page
Let’s keep this one about the countywide stuff.
Let’s keep this one about the countywide stuff.
Anonymous
01/21/2020 08:54
Subject: The Facts About the Districtwide Boundary Analysis
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:the lawsuit is about getting the word ESPECIALLY removed from the FAA so that kids aren't used as pawns in a social engineering experiment.
No, it's not. I guess you didn't read the Bethesda Beat piece.
But my SPLEEN!!!!
I WILL NEVER LET YOU REMOVE MY SPLEEN!!!!!!1!1!1!!!
Anonymous
01/21/2020 08:50
Subject: The Facts About the Districtwide Boundary Analysis
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:the lawsuit is about getting the word ESPECIALLY removed from the FAA so that kids aren't used as pawns in a social engineering experiment.
No, it's not. I guess you didn't read the Bethesda Beat piece.
But my SPLEEN!!!!