Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yeah, seems kind of important....
Liberals are being played yet again. These reporters have a book to sell. Their sourcing is crap. They did not talk to ONE of the people headlined in their story. Pitiful.

According to the Times, Stier "notified senators and the FBI about this account, but the FBI did not investigate and Mr. Stier has declined to discuss it publicly."

But the Times' article did not mention that Pogrebin and Kelly's book found that the female student in question denied any knowledge of the alleged episode.

"The book notes, quietly, that the woman Max Stier named as having been supposedly victimized by Kavanaugh and friends denies any memory of the alleged event," noted The Federalist's Mollie Hemingway. "Seems, I don’t know, significant."

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/kavanaugh-must-be-impeached-harris-says-as-new-uncorroborated-allegation-surfaces

Mollie Hemingway used to be a decent person. At some point she decided there was more $ to be made doing the right wing grift.

And yes, they have a book coming out- you think that the info being in a book means it's *less* reliable?

You know Mollie Hemingway also wrote a book about Kavanaugh, if that's your standard?

Are you claiming that what Mollie Hemingway has stated is not true? (Hint: She is correct)
And, the book Hemingway authored is excellent and full of source material. She and her co-author actually *talked* to people they reported on. Unlike these two from the NYTimes.

What are you even talking about? Of course the NY Times reporters did - you know - reporting. What in the world would ever make you say otherwise?[b]

Trump tweeting about how great MH's book is tells you all you need to know - partisan dreck designed to please King Tiny Hands and his idiot minions

These "reporters" did not talk to Stier. They did not talk to the woman who reportedly was the "victim" in this story. All of their reporting is through 2nd or 3rd hand accounts.
That is NOT the way to source a story and any journalist worthy of any credibility knows that.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yeah, seems kind of important....
Liberals are being played yet again. These reporters have a book to sell. Their sourcing is crap. They did not talk to ONE of the people headlined in their story. Pitiful.

According to the Times, Stier "notified senators and the FBI about this account, but the FBI did not investigate and Mr. Stier has declined to discuss it publicly."

But the Times' article did not mention that Pogrebin and Kelly's book found that the female student in question denied any knowledge of the alleged episode.

"The book notes, quietly, that the woman Max Stier named as having been supposedly victimized by Kavanaugh and friends denies any memory of the alleged event," noted The Federalist's Mollie Hemingway. "Seems, I don’t know, significant."

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/kavanaugh-must-be-impeached-harris-says-as-new-uncorroborated-allegation-surfaces

Mollie Hemingway used to be a decent person. At some point she decided there was more $ to be made doing the right wing grift.

And yes, they have a book coming out- you think that the info being in a book means it's *less* reliable?

You know Mollie Hemingway also wrote a book about Kavanaugh, if that's your standard?

Are you claiming that what Mollie Hemingway has stated is not true? (Hint: She is correct)
And, the book Hemingway authored is excellent and full of source material. She and her co-author actually *talked* to people they reported on. Unlike these two from the NYTimes.

What are you even talking about? Of course the NY Times reporters did - you know - reporting. What in the world would ever make you say otherwise?[b]

Trump tweeting about how great MH's book is tells you all you need to know - partisan dreck designed to please King Tiny Hands and his idiot minions

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yeah, seems kind of important....
Liberals are being played yet again. These reporters have a book to sell. Their sourcing is crap. They did not talk to ONE of the people headlined in their story. Pitiful.

According to the Times, Stier "notified senators and the FBI about this account, but the FBI did not investigate and Mr. Stier has declined to discuss it publicly."

But the Times' article did not mention that Pogrebin and Kelly's book found that the female student in question denied any knowledge of the alleged episode.

"The book notes, quietly, that the woman Max Stier named as having been supposedly victimized by Kavanaugh and friends denies any memory of the alleged event," noted The Federalist's Mollie Hemingway. "Seems, I don’t know, significant."

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/kavanaugh-must-be-impeached-harris-says-as-new-uncorroborated-allegation-surfaces

Mollie Hemingway used to be a decent person. At some point she decided there was more $ to be made doing the right wing grift.

And yes, they have a book coming out- you think that the info being in a book means it's *less* reliable?

You know Mollie Hemingway also wrote a book about Kavanaugh, if that's your standard?

Are you claiming that what Mollie Hemingway has stated is not true? (Hint: She is correct)
And, the book Hemingway authored is excellent and full of source material. She and her co-author actually *talked* to people they reported on. Unlike these two from the NYTimes.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yep. He liiiiiieeeeeeed at his hearings.

You hear that, Republicurds? You supported a sexual assaulted and a liar.

Not the first time. Remember Clarence Thomas? Nothing will happen to Kàvanaugh.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yeah, seems kind of important....
Liberals are being played yet again. These reporters have a book to sell. Their sourcing is crap. They did not talk to ONE of the people headlined in their story. Pitiful.

According to the Times, Stier "notified senators and the FBI about this account, but the FBI did not investigate and Mr. Stier has declined to discuss it publicly."

But the Times' article did not mention that Pogrebin and Kelly's book found that the female student in question denied any knowledge of the alleged episode.

"The book notes, quietly, that the woman Max Stier named as having been supposedly victimized by Kavanaugh and friends denies any memory of the alleged event," noted The Federalist's Mollie Hemingway. "Seems, I don’t know, significant."

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/kavanaugh-must-be-impeached-harris-says-as-new-uncorroborated-allegation-surfaces

Mollie Hemingway used to be a decent person. At some point she decided there was more $ to be made doing the right wing grift.

And yes, they have a book coming out- you think that the info being in a book means it's *less* reliable?

You know Mollie Hemingway also wrote a book about Kavanaugh, if that's your standard?

Anonymous wrote:Read Mollie's book. Unlike the excerpts from this book, hers were sourced. Almost all sources were named. You know, journalism.

Anonymous wrote:Yeah, seems kind of important....
Liberals are being played yet again. These reporters have a book to sell. Their sourcing is crap. They did not talk to ONE of the people headlined in their story. Pitiful.

According to the Times, Stier "notified senators and the FBI about this account, but the FBI did not investigate and Mr. Stier has declined to discuss it publicly."

But the Times' article did not mention that Pogrebin and Kelly's book found that the female student in question denied any knowledge of the alleged episode.

"The book notes, quietly, that the woman Max Stier named as having been supposedly victimized by Kavanaugh and friends denies any memory of the alleged event," noted The Federalist's Mollie Hemingway. "Seems, I don’t know, significant."

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/kavanaugh-must-be-impeached-harris-says-as-new-uncorroborated-allegation-surfaces

Anonymous wrote:Yeah, seems kind of important....
Liberals are being played yet again. These reporters have a book to sell. Their sourcing is crap. They did not talk to ONE of the people headlined in their story. Pitiful.

According to the Times, Stier "notified senators and the FBI about this account, but the FBI did not investigate and Mr. Stier has declined to discuss it publicly."

But the Times' article did not mention that Pogrebin and Kelly's book found that the female student in question denied any knowledge of the alleged episode.

"The book notes, quietly, that the woman Max Stier named as having been supposedly victimized by Kavanaugh and friends denies any memory of the alleged event," noted The Federalist's Mollie Hemingway. "Seems, I don’t know, significant."

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/kavanaugh-must-be-impeached-harris-says-as-new-uncorroborated-allegation-surfaces

According to the Times, Stier "notified senators and the FBI about this account, but the FBI did not investigate and Mr. Stier has declined to discuss it publicly."

But the Times' article did not mention that Pogrebin and Kelly's book found that the female student in question denied any knowledge of the alleged episode.

"The book notes, quietly, that the woman Max Stier named as having been supposedly victimized by Kavanaugh and friends denies any memory of the alleged event," noted The Federalist's Mollie Hemingway. "Seems, I don’t know, significant."

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump received 3 million fewer votes than his competition and appointed one justice to stolen seat and another credibly accused of sexual harrasment

Senators who voted to confirm Gorsuch and Kavanaugh represented 22 million and 38 mil fewer Americans than senators who opposed them.

We have a tyranny of the minority in the United States.

Yea we do and they still sound like victimized howler monkeys. “Meeeeee meeee meeeee! I’m underrepresented! Meeeeee! Everyone else’s issues is identity politics, big everything I like is super duper the most important!!!! White Christians are victims!! White men have no rights!!!!”

Anonymous wrote:Trump received 3 million fewer votes than his competition and appointed one justice to stolen seat and another credibly accused of sexual harrasment

Senators who voted to confirm Gorsuch and Kavanaugh represented 22 million and 38 mil fewer Americans than senators who opposed them.

We have a tyranny of the minority in the United States.

Anonymous wrote:Yep. He liiiiiieeeeeeed at his hearings.

You hear that, Republicurds? You supported a sexual assaulted and a liar.