Reply to 8/27 APS Work Session—Elementary Boundaries

Forum Index » Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)

Reply to "8/27 APS Work Session—Elementary Boundaries"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Why don’t they just ‘Fleet’ McKinley?  Move majority of McKinely to Reed, keeping same admins and teachers etc like PH to Fleet, and keeping majority of students. The make McKinely an option school for ATS, and then ATS becomes Key Immersion destination?

[/quote]

Yes...[/quote]

Why is this better than making reed option?   Plus McKinley is not walkers to reed and tuckahoe largely is[/quote]

Or make tuckahoe Reed but that changes boundaries more b/c Reed is In McKinely zone[/quote]

Red is I. Tuckahoe zone[/quote]

Oh I see. Yeah, it’s being built on the boundary of Tuckahoe and McKinely zone. Sure you can make it Tuckahoe, I don’t really care. But it seems much closer to the majority of  McKinely and changing that boundary literally only changes a couple of PU immediately adjacent between McKinely and Tuckahoe.

Yeah some work on the edges but less disruptive and it gets us an option school out west with less drama.

https://www.apsva.us/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Elementary-School-Boundary-Map-SY19-20.pdf[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics