Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "Is U Chicago worth cost over in-state UVA?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Or we just have fundamentally different values. Scorecard data, BTW, will not be indicative of salaries generally. It’s based only on attendees who received federal aid.[/quote] How do you think this affects the data?[/quote] For one thing it changes ROI calculations because the spread between the costs of the two schools narrows dramatically in that income bracket. (It’s only about $6,400 per year, and the salary differential at year 10 is about $4,800 per year. Chicago is the higher figure in both cases). Also, a working class kid’s version of what a comfortable salary looks like may well be very different from an upper middle class kid’s. (I say this as a former working class kid who chose academia over BigLaw — both represented upward mobility to me, and one involved work that seemed to me to be a helluva lot more interesting than the other.). Plus the UMC kid may well have opportunities not available to the working-class kid (based on upbringing, network, wealth, etc.) I’ll also add that a worker whose terminal degree is a BA will be at a very different place in his or her career (wrt future earning potential) 10 years out of college vs a worker who has earned a PhD or MD or even a JD. This is a separate issue from the unrepresentative sample, but it also affects how you interpret the data. Personally, if I were an ROI type, I’d be more interested in earnings/assets of alumni in their mid 50s than their early 30s. For the (other) poster who claimed that scorecard data was for all alumni. Nope, the website is quite specific: “Salary After Attending” is defined as “The median earnings of former students [b]who received federal financial aid,[/b] at 10 years after entering the school.” (Emphasis mine). [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics