Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Off-Topic
Reply to "Anybody following the Karen Read trial in Boston?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]For those of you who think she didn't do it - what do you make of JOK's niece testifying that Karen was talking about him possibly getting hit by a snowplow before they ever found his body? Was his niece lying too?[/quote] I say the medical evidence is clear that he wasn’t struck by a vehicle and that tells me more than any panicking gibberish she may have been uttering before he was found.[/quote] It’s not really clear he wasn’t clipped. It is clear he wasn’t hit directly which the prosecution never claimed. [/quote] I disagree. The evidence is clear that he wasn’t clipped by a vehicle either. If he was clipped with enough force to propel him onto the lawn, it would have caused distinctive injuries. The defense experts testified about “clipping” scenarios. If her vehicle clipped him gently, he doesn’t end up on the lawn. If her vehicle clips him at 25 mph, he ends up on the lawn with massive bruising and fractures from the impact. The commonwealth was also unable to recreate a scenario where he gets clipped with enough force to break the taillights but doesn’t sustain tell-tale injuries. [/quote] Yeah that is not good for the prosecution but I still don’t rule it out. Too many variables. I don’t believe in the coincidence that his last steps are recorded right after she reversed and peeled out of the Albert’s house and she was already talking about the possibility that she hit him or something hit him before he was even found yet they were the ones who killed him later and put him on the lawn. Just, no. Their behavior with the phones and everything the next day and after are definitely weird. Can’t explain that except they were drunk and probably hiding something else. Proctor’s texts are ultimately what did this case in though. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics