Reply to GA Case

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "GA Case"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]If all of the allegations are true that she hired someone she is personally connected to, that person has questionable qualifications for the position, paid him more than others in the same position and personally benefited from those funds paid by going on trips he paid for.

[b]All of that, if proven, would constitute serious crimes [/b]and if she’s convicted of those crimes everyone convicted in a prosecution she has any involvement with would likely have a strong case to at least receive a new trial.

Many of those cases, due to the amount of time passed, availability of witnesses and other issues would likely not be able to be retried possibly allowing many violent criminals to go free.

When you elect a political hack and possible criminal to be the district attorney bad things happen.[/quote]

Serious crimes?  What are the statutes?

So far, I have not seen anyone cite any statutes because, if all of those things that you listed are true, they are not criminal.  [/quote]

But they show really poor judgement, right?[/quote]

Poor judgment about one's lovelife is not a crime - nor is it an indictment of someone's judgment in any other area of life including professional.

Did you learn nothing from the prosecution of Bill Clinton for having an affair?  [/quote]

May not be crimes, but definitely the display of poor judgement. Deceipt and dishonesty are, at the least, a reflection of poor judgement and cannot be compartmentalized as cleanly as you might hope.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics