Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Judge in Fulton Co. to hold emergency hearing in special prosecutor Nathan Wade's divorce case at 11:30 AM today.

Likely addressing request to 'unseal' Wade's divorce proceedings/documents and address Fanni's Motion to Quash subpoena issued to her as well.

Evidently, it is highly unusual for divorce records to be sealed. Who do you think had them sealed?
Can't see how Fani gets out of testifying now that we see the records showing he paid for trips for her.

I am not an attorney and don't know the law around this at all.

So question; wouldn't it be some kind of abuse of power that Willis used her ability to seal a case for personal gain? Or as favors to Wade? I can't imagine that is legal, let alone ethical.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If all of the allegations are true that she hired someone she is personally connected to, that person has questionable qualifications for the position, paid him more than others in the same position and personally benefited from those funds paid by going on trips he paid for.

All of that, if proven, would constitute serious crimes and if she’s convicted of those crimes everyone convicted in a prosecution she has any involvement with would likely have a strong case to at least receive a new trial.

Many of those cases, due to the amount of time passed, availability of witnesses and other issues would likely not be able to be retried possibly allowing many violent criminals to go free.

When you elect a political hack and possible criminal to be the district attorney bad things happen.

Serious crimes? What are the statutes?

So far, I have not seen anyone cite any statutes because, if all of those things that you listed are true, they are not criminal.

But they show really poor judgement, right?

Poor judgment about one's lovelife is not a crime - nor is it an indictment of someone's judgment in any other area of life including professional.

Did you learn nothing from the prosecution of Bill Clinton for having an affair?

Anonymous wrote:Let's be clear here: none of this absolves Trump or erases the mountains of evidence against him. The filing is yet another case of Trump desperately trying to postpone the trial until/if he's reelected, at which time he will pardon himself.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Judge in Fulton Co. to hold emergency hearing in special prosecutor Nathan Wade's divorce case at 11:30 AM today.

Likely addressing request to 'unseal' Wade's divorce proceedings/documents and address Fanni's Motion to Quash subpoena issued to her as well.

Evidently, it is highly unusual for divorce records to be sealed. Who do you think had them sealed?
Can't see how Fani gets out of testifying now that we see the records showing he paid for trips for her.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let's be clear here: none of this absolves Trump or erases the mountains of evidence against him. The filing is yet another case of Trump desperately trying to postpone the trial until/if he's reelected, at which time he will pardon himself.

Doesn't matter - this case is going to be transferred to another DA's office at a minimum and the trial will not happen until 2025 well after DJT is elected President (doesn't look like Biden is beating anything at this point).

I mean, how many Republicans have been elected anything post-Dobbs? While Biden doesn't have a strong personal following, he represents choice - which every town, city, state in the country is overwhelmingly in favor of.

Whether or not Trump is a convicted felon, he will not be elected president.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let's be clear here: none of this absolves Trump or erases the mountains of evidence against him. The filing is yet another case of Trump desperately trying to postpone the trial until/if he's reelected, at which time he will pardon himself.

Doesn't matter - this case is going to be transferred to another DA's office at a minimum and the trial will not happen until 2025 well after DJT is elected President (doesn't look like Biden is beating anything at this point).

Anonymous wrote:Let's be clear here: none of this absolves Trump or erases the mountains of evidence against him. The filing is yet another case of Trump desperately trying to postpone the trial until/if he's reelected, at which time he will pardon himself.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If all of the allegations are true that she hired someone she is personally connected to, that person has questionable qualifications for the position, paid him more than others in the same position and personally benefited from those funds paid by going on trips he paid for.

All of that, if proven, would constitute serious crimes and if she’s convicted of those crimes everyone convicted in a prosecution she has any involvement with would likely have a strong case to at least receive a new trial.

Many of those cases, due to the amount of time passed, availability of witnesses and other issues would likely not be able to be retried possibly allowing many violent criminals to go free.

When you elect a political hack and possible criminal to be the district attorney bad things happen.

Serious crimes? What are the statutes?

So far, I have not seen anyone cite any statutes because, if all of those things that you listed are true, they are not criminal.

But they show really poor judgement, right?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If all of the allegations are true that she hired someone she is personally connected to, that person has questionable qualifications for the position, paid him more than others in the same position and personally benefited from those funds paid by going on trips he paid for.

All of that, if proven, would constitute serious crimes and if she’s convicted of those crimes everyone convicted in a prosecution she has any involvement with would likely have a strong case to at least receive a new trial.

Many of those cases, due to the amount of time passed, availability of witnesses and other issues would likely not be able to be retried possibly allowing many violent criminals to go free.

When you elect a political hack and possible criminal to be the district attorney bad things happen.

Serious crimes? What are the statutes?

So far, I have not seen anyone cite any statutes because, if all of those things that you listed are true, they are not criminal.

Anonymous wrote:If all of the allegations are true that she hired someone she is personally connected to, that person has questionable qualifications for the position, paid him more than others in the same position and personally benefited from those funds paid by going on trips he paid for.

All of that, if proven, would constitute serious crimes and if she’s convicted of those crimes everyone convicted in a prosecution she has any involvement with would likely have a strong case to at least receive a new trial.

Many of those cases, due to the amount of time passed, availability of witnesses and other issues would likely not be able to be retried possibly allowing many violent criminals to go free.

When you elect a political hack and possible criminal to be the district attorney bad things happen.