Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "GA Case"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]If all of the allegations are true that she hired someone she is personally connected to, that person has questionable qualifications for the position, paid him more than others in the same position and personally benefited from those funds paid by going on trips he paid for. [b]All of that, if proven, would constitute serious crimes [/b]and if she’s convicted of those crimes everyone convicted in a prosecution she has any involvement with would likely have a strong case to at least receive a new trial. Many of those cases, due to the amount of time passed, availability of witnesses and other issues would likely not be able to be retried possibly allowing many violent criminals to go free. When you elect a political hack and possible criminal to be the district attorney bad things happen.[/quote] Serious crimes? What are the statutes? So far, I have not seen anyone cite any statutes because, if all of those things that you listed are true, they are not criminal. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics