Reply to Chelsea Clinton's husband closing Greek-focused hf after losing 90% of investors asstes

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Chelsea Clinton's husband closing Greek-focused hf after losing 90% of investors asstes"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I'm still waiting for all the self-proclaimed hedge fund experts to describe the exact nature of the alleged breach of fiduciary duty.  They could also point us to evidence of a claim asserted against the hedge fund by an investor (or group of investors) or a coverage dispute between the fund and its insurer.  It's hard to keep something like this under wraps for long in the financial world, particularly if there's a potential political angle.  [/quote]

** crickets **[/quote]

Not sure you guys are getting it. It's potentially shady, even if he didn't violate his fiduciary duty under the law. Do you think all those investors would have given him the same amount of money even if he wasn't married to Chelsea? If not, why did they do it? Also, even if they feel ripped off after the fund blew up, do you really believe they will think it's in their best interest to go after Chelsea's hubby? Seems like they might just want to keep quiet for now and maybe look for a favor down the road when HRC is president.
[/quote]

Everything involving hedge funds is potentially shady.  So, in theory, he is disqualified from running an investment firm because his MIL might run for President?  Makes perfect sense in Trumpworld, where's it cool to scam your Average Joe trying to get ahead by taking "courses" at his "University."  [/quote]

If you want to talk about how Trump sucks, maybe start a different thread?[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics