Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm still waiting for all the self-proclaimed hedge fund experts to describe the exact nature of the alleged breach of fiduciary duty. They could also point us to evidence of a claim asserted against the hedge fund by an investor (or group of investors) or a coverage dispute between the fund and its insurer. It's hard to keep something like this under wraps for long in the financial world, particularly if there's a potential political angle.
** crickets **
Not sure you guys are getting it. It's potentially shady, even if he didn't violate his fiduciary duty under the law. Do you think all those investors would have given him the same amount of money even if he wasn't married to Chelsea? If not, why did they do it? Also, even if they feel ripped off after the fund blew up, do you really believe they will think it's in their best interest to go after Chelsea's hubby? Seems like they might just want to keep quiet for now and maybe look for a favor down the road when HRC is president.
Everything involving hedge funds is potentially shady. So, in theory, he is disqualified from running an investment firm because his MIL might run for President? Makes perfect sense in Trumpworld, where's it cool to scam your Average Joe trying to get ahead by taking "courses" at his "University."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm still waiting for all the self-proclaimed hedge fund experts to describe the exact nature of the alleged breach of fiduciary duty. They could also point us to evidence of a claim asserted against the hedge fund by an investor (or group of investors) or a coverage dispute between the fund and its insurer. It's hard to keep something like this under wraps for long in the financial world, particularly if there's a potential political angle.
Hillary has so many scandals, this one didn't make top one. Plus you have a crooked media.
Based on his investment record, he should be fired at a minimum and go scam at Clinton Foundation. How can he afford living in a 10 million dollar apartment when he loses 90% of assets?
I'm pretty sure he's not going to be "fired" from the investment firm he co-founded with two colleagues from Goldman Sachs. This wasn't their only hedge fund and its a safe bet he wasn't making investment decisions on his own. By the way, do you even understand how a hedge fund operates? Please don't continue to embarsss yourself with inane comments that are barely coherent comments.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm still waiting for all the self-proclaimed hedge fund experts to describe the exact nature of the alleged breach of fiduciary duty. They could also point us to evidence of a claim asserted against the hedge fund by an investor (or group of investors) or a coverage dispute between the fund and its insurer. It's hard to keep something like this under wraps for long in the financial world, particularly if there's a potential political angle.
** crickets **
Not sure you guys are getting it. It's potentially shady, even if he didn't violate his fiduciary duty under the law. Do you think all those investors would have given him the same amount of money even if he wasn't married to Chelsea? If not, why did they do it? Also, even if they feel ripped off after the fund blew up, do you really believe they will think it's in their best interest to go after Chelsea's hubby? Seems like they might just want to keep quiet for now and maybe look for a favor down the road when HRC is president.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm still waiting for all the self-proclaimed hedge fund experts to describe the exact nature of the alleged breach of fiduciary duty. They could also point us to evidence of a claim asserted against the hedge fund by an investor (or group of investors) or a coverage dispute between the fund and its insurer. It's hard to keep something like this under wraps for long in the financial world, particularly if there's a potential political angle.
** crickets **
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm still waiting for all the self-proclaimed hedge fund experts to describe the exact nature of the alleged breach of fiduciary duty. They could also point us to evidence of a claim asserted against the hedge fund by an investor (or group of investors) or a coverage dispute between the fund and its insurer. It's hard to keep something like this under wraps for long in the financial world, particularly if there's a potential political angle.
Hillary has so many scandals, this one didn't make top one. Plus you have a crooked media.
Based on his investment record, he should be fired at a minimum and go scam at Clinton Foundation. How can he afford living in a 10 million dollar apartment when he loses 90% of assets?
I'm pretty sure he's not going to be "fired" from the investment firm he co-founded with two colleagues from Goldman Sachs. This wasn't their only hedge fund and its a safe bet he wasn't making investment decisions on his own. By the way, do you even understand how a hedge fund operates? Please don't continue to embarsss yourself with inane comments that are barely coherent comments.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm still waiting for all the self-proclaimed hedge fund experts to describe the exact nature of the alleged breach of fiduciary duty. They could also point us to evidence of a claim asserted against the hedge fund by an investor (or group of investors) or a coverage dispute between the fund and its insurer. It's hard to keep something like this under wraps for long in the financial world, particularly if there's a potential political angle.
Hillary has so many scandals, this one didn't make top one. Plus you have a crooked media.
Based on his investment record, he should be fired at a minimum and go scam at Clinton Foundation. How can he afford living in a 10 million dollar apartment when he loses 90% of assets?
Anonymous wrote:I'm still waiting for all the self-proclaimed hedge fund experts to describe the exact nature of the alleged breach of fiduciary duty. They could also point us to evidence of a claim asserted against the hedge fund by an investor (or group of investors) or a coverage dispute between the fund and its insurer. It's hard to keep something like this under wraps for long in the financial world, particularly if there's a potential political angle.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Strangely, this whole issue - the Mezvinsky hedge fund - has not been discussed in the media too much.
Because "Rich investors lose money betting on Greek debt" is a dog-bites-man story.
Also, sons-in-law are not generally newsworthy for a campaign. Unless they get a veto on VP picks or something.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm still waiting for all the self-proclaimed hedge fund experts to describe the exact nature of the alleged breach of fiduciary duty. They could also point us to evidence of a claim asserted against the hedge fund by an investor (or group of investors) or a coverage dispute between the fund and its insurer. It's hard to keep something like this under wraps for long in the financial world, particularly if there's a potential political angle.
Hillary has so many scandals, this one didn't make top one. Plus you have a crooked media.
Based on his investment record, he should be fired at a minimum and go scam at Clinton Foundation. How can he afford living in a 10 million dollar apartment when he loses 90% of assets?
It's more important for the media to focus for three days on Melania's speech screw-up.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm still waiting for all the self-proclaimed hedge fund experts to describe the exact nature of the alleged breach of fiduciary duty. They could also point us to evidence of a claim asserted against the hedge fund by an investor (or group of investors) or a coverage dispute between the fund and its insurer. It's hard to keep something like this under wraps for long in the financial world, particularly if there's a potential political angle.
Hillary has so many scandals, this one didn't make top one. Plus you have a crooked media.
Based on his investment record, he should be fired at a minimum and go scam at Clinton Foundation. How can he afford living in a 10 million dollar apartment when he loses 90% of assets?
Anonymous wrote:He is a very shrewd investor
Anonymous wrote:I'm still waiting for all the self-proclaimed hedge fund experts to describe the exact nature of the alleged breach of fiduciary duty. They could also point us to evidence of a claim asserted against the hedge fund by an investor (or group of investors) or a coverage dispute between the fund and its insurer. It's hard to keep something like this under wraps for long in the financial world, particularly if there's a potential political angle.