Reply to Princeton has 8 suicides in 3 years

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "Princeton has 8 suicides in 3 years "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I'm a Princeton alum as well but I differ somewhat from the previous poster. When I attended there was a strong sense of "separating the wheat from the chaff" in a way that I suspect differs from most peer schools. I think this is most concretely epitomized by grade deflation and also by the hierarchy of eating clubs and extracurricular activities on campus. In general, hierarchy was inescapably both academically and socially. Maybe this is true at most elite schools, but I'd never experienced hierarchy like that before Princeton and honestly haven't experienced it at any time in my adult life since. Comparing notes against colleagues who attended peer schools, I tend to think that Princeton's focus on hierarchy is uniquely intense.

I believe that grade deflation was just a manifestation of the school's culture of hierarchy. At least academically, there's a very strong sense of meritocracy - which depending on perspective is a good thing. However, it often comes along with a sort of Puritanism on the part of administration and faculty where academic achievement is presented as the end all be all of life and as being "moral." In some way, it makes sense since the institution is the closest I know of to being a true "ivory tower." Most peer institutions are strongly influenced by professional schools and ties to industry, whereas Princeton exists in relative isolation from the rest of the world. It is a much more "pure" version of academia. I think this is excellent for students who intend on entering academia but inappropriate for most others.

During my time at Princeton, I couldn't help but feel that the grade deflation policy arose from some sense of being high and mighty or "holier than thou." There was a sense that Princeton needed to deflate grades to preserve its purity. A clear pecking order among students needed to be strictly enforced in order for administration to feel they were upholding their moral obligations. I think this manifests in other core elements of the Princeton such as the Honor Committee, which is essentially a tribunal of overzealous pre-law students who enforce Princeton's sometimes draconian academic codes.

Unfortunately, the hierarchy of extracurricular activities and eating clubs also meant there wasn't much social escape from the pressures and academic culture. Additionally the relative geographic isolation made it difficult to find an escape outside of the college. During my time there I at least personally felt trapped and am glad that college is now in the distant past. I think that the campus is beautiful and the teaching quality is exceptional. However, the culture(from the top down) is deeply unhealthy.  My time at Princeton crushed my confidence in my early twenties and I think that the grade deflation policy had meaningful professional consequences in my early career. I've since built a successful career but I don't credit Princeton for it in the slightest. I am actively discouraging my own children from applying.[/quote]

This makes sense. Do you think the TO policies have let in students who can't do the work which would cause them to be more stressed out?[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics