Reply to Rich Men North of Richmond

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Rich Men North of Richmond"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]A “hero of the far right” blames his problems on  heavyset women (because of course no men are 5’ 3” in the heroic sub-Richmond) on welfare and anyone is supposed to take this seriously? Really OP?

Angry white dude is misogynist, news at 11[/quote]

It's because those are mostly the women who want to go out with him.[/quote]

Where did he say anything about women in his song?  [/quote]

How many men are 5’3”?[/quote]

Enough.  About 10%.  [/quote]

Not in America. But sure let’s say it’s 10% You think he’s writing about men?[/quote]

He is writing about obese people using their food stamps to purchase junk food that makes them more obese.  Do you not get that?  Do you not understand that he is slamming government programs that actually encourages this by putting few restrictions on the kind of food they can purchase?  [/quote]

Do you know why it’s that way? Because food stamps/SNAP is a USDA program under the jurisdiction of the House and Senate Agriculture committees, which have zero woke members. To the Ag committees, SNAP is a program for farmers, dairies, meat packers, packaged food corporations, and supermarket chains to be paid retail prices with no nutritional restrictions. It would be cheaper for the government to buy nutritious food in bulk from low bidders and distribute it, but then the dairies, farmers, meat producers, and other food corporations, and the WalMarts, Winn Dixies, Piggly Wigglys, and other supermarkets would not make the maximum possible profits off the program.

If you follow the money, all low & moderate income programs subsidize some powerful corporate or institutional lobbying sector (pharma, insurers, nursing home owners & investors, housing builders & developers, bankers, employers, etc.) as the profit-making provider or seller of the benefits. It’s the only way to get programs for poor people through the House and Senate and keep them from being repealed. The money goes to the donors. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics