Reply to High Fashion in your 50s

Forum Index » Beauty and Fashion

Reply to "High Fashion in your 50s "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote]Kim looks young though. Nicole looks much much older than her.[/quote]

...because she is. 13 years.

It's almost the same age difference as between Kim and Kendall. Kendall looks younger than Kim, what a surprise![/quote]

Kim doesn’t look that much older than Kendall though. Nicole Kidman looks like Kim’s mom in that pic.[/quote]

No, she does not. And that statement is hyperbolic and absurd.[/quote]

What exactly is absurd about it? Kim has no wrinkles, sagging in that picture. NK is heavily wrinkled, especially her neck, and her thinness exaggerates it.[/quote]

Nah, it's Kim who always looks mumsy with her heavy bottom. [/quote]

We can’t see her butt in that picture though, so irrelevant.[/quote]

That might be, but what's relevant is that in reality there is a significant age difference + those pictures are taken in a different lighting, Kim's being overexposed.
With all those shadows you'd look like Kim's mother as well :lol: [/quote]

Plus, Kim is infamously known for excessive photoshoping and altering[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics