Anonymous
12/12/2022 14:44
Subject: Re:High Fashion in your 50s
Anonymous
12/04/2022 10:04
Subject: Re:High Fashion in your 50s
Grece is fun, stylish and she’s not trying to look too young.
Anonymous
12/04/2022 10:03
Subject: Re:High Fashion in your 50s
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Kim looks young though. Nicole looks much much older than her.
...because she is. 13 years.
It's almost the same age difference as between Kim and Kendall. Kendall looks younger than Kim, what a surprise!
Kim doesn’t look that much older than Kendall though. Nicole Kidman looks like Kim’s mom in that pic.
No, she does not. And that statement is hyperbolic and absurd.
What exactly is absurd about it? Kim has no wrinkles, sagging in that picture. NK is heavily wrinkled, especially her neck, and her thinness exaggerates it.
Nah, it's Kim who always looks mumsy with her heavy bottom.
We can’t see her butt in that picture though, so irrelevant.
That might be, but what's relevant is that in reality there is a significant age difference + those pictures are taken in a different lighting, Kim's being overexposed.
With all those shadows you'd look like Kim's mother as well
Plus, Kim is infamously known for excessive photoshoping and altering
Anonymous
12/04/2022 09:29
Subject: Re:High Fashion in your 50s
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Kim looks young though. Nicole looks much much older than her.
...because she is. 13 years.
It's almost the same age difference as between Kim and Kendall. Kendall looks younger than Kim, what a surprise!
Kim doesn’t look that much older than Kendall though. Nicole Kidman looks like Kim’s mom in that pic.
No, she does not. And that statement is hyperbolic and absurd.
What exactly is absurd about it? Kim has no wrinkles, sagging in that picture. NK is heavily wrinkled, especially her neck, and her thinness exaggerates it.
Nah, it's Kim who always looks mumsy with her heavy bottom.
We can’t see her butt in that picture though, so irrelevant.
That might be, but what's relevant is that in reality there is a significant age difference + those pictures are taken in a different lighting, Kim's being overexposed.
With all those shadows you'd look like Kim's mother as well
Anonymous
12/04/2022 09:08
Subject: Re:High Fashion in your 50s
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Kim looks young though. Nicole looks much much older than her.
...because she is. 13 years.
It's almost the same age difference as between Kim and Kendall. Kendall looks younger than Kim, what a surprise!
Kim doesn’t look that much older than Kendall though. Nicole Kidman looks like Kim’s mom in that pic.
No, she does not. And that statement is hyperbolic and absurd.
What exactly is absurd about it? Kim has no wrinkles, sagging in that picture. NK is heavily wrinkled, especially her neck, and her thinness exaggerates it.
Nah, it's Kim who always looks mumsy with her heavy bottom.
We can’t see her butt in that picture though, so irrelevant.
Anonymous
12/04/2022 08:46
Subject: Re:High Fashion in your 50s
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Kim looks young though. Nicole looks much much older than her.
...because she is. 13 years.
It's almost the same age difference as between Kim and Kendall. Kendall looks younger than Kim, what a surprise!
Kim doesn’t look that much older than Kendall though. Nicole Kidman looks like Kim’s mom in that pic.
No, she does not. And that statement is hyperbolic and absurd.
What exactly is absurd about it? Kim has no wrinkles, sagging in that picture. NK is heavily wrinkled, especially her neck, and her thinness exaggerates it.
I’ve hardly call Nicole “heavily wrinkled”!
It’s not a competition but it is simply unfair to compare aging with one so fair-skinned and the other 13 years younger with Middle- Eastern heritage.
Anonymous
12/04/2022 08:21
Subject: Re:High Fashion in your 50s
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Kim looks young though. Nicole looks much much older than her.
...because she is. 13 years.
It's almost the same age difference as between Kim and Kendall. Kendall looks younger than Kim, what a surprise!
Kim doesn’t look that much older than Kendall though. Nicole Kidman looks like Kim’s mom in that pic.
No, she does not. And that statement is hyperbolic and absurd.
What exactly is absurd about it? Kim has no wrinkles, sagging in that picture. NK is heavily wrinkled, especially her neck, and her thinness exaggerates it.
I’ve hardly call Nicole “heavily wrinkled”!
Anonymous
12/04/2022 08:14
Subject: Re:High Fashion in your 50s
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Kim looks young though. Nicole looks much much older than her.
...because she is. 13 years.
It's almost the same age difference as between Kim and Kendall. Kendall looks younger than Kim, what a surprise!
Kim doesn’t look that much older than Kendall though. Nicole Kidman looks like Kim’s mom in that pic.
No, she does not. And that statement is hyperbolic and absurd.
What exactly is absurd about it? Kim has no wrinkles, sagging in that picture. NK is heavily wrinkled, especially her neck, and her thinness exaggerates it.
Nah, it's Kim who always looks mumsy with her heavy bottom.
Anonymous
12/04/2022 00:36
Subject: Re:High Fashion in your 50s
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Kim looks young though. Nicole looks much much older than her.
...because she is. 13 years.
It's almost the same age difference as between Kim and Kendall. Kendall looks younger than Kim, what a surprise!
Kim doesn’t look that much older than Kendall though. Nicole Kidman looks like Kim’s mom in that pic.
No, she does not. And that statement is hyperbolic and absurd.
What exactly is absurd about it? Kim has no wrinkles, sagging in that picture. NK is heavily wrinkled, especially her neck, and her thinness exaggerates it.
Anonymous
12/03/2022 20:47
Subject: Re:High Fashion in your 50s
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Kim looks young though. Nicole looks much much older than her.
...because she is. 13 years.
It's almost the same age difference as between Kim and Kendall. Kendall looks younger than Kim, what a surprise!
Kim doesn’t look that much older than Kendall though. Nicole Kidman looks like Kim’s mom in that pic.
No, she does not. And that statement is hyperbolic and absurd.
Anonymous
12/03/2022 10:38
Subject: Re:High Fashion in your 50s
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Kim looks young though. Nicole looks much much older than her.
...because she is. 13 years.
It's almost the same age difference as between Kim and Kendall. Kendall looks younger than Kim, what a surprise!
Kim doesn’t look that much older than Kendall though. Nicole Kidman looks like Kim’s mom in that pic.
That is because the Balenciaga glasses are much more flattering on Kim. They have completely different shaped faces. You can clearly tell Nicole is uncomfortable in them in the video previously posted.
Anonymous
12/03/2022 10:34
Subject: Re:High Fashion in your 50s
Anonymous wrote:Kim looks young though. Nicole looks much much older than her.
...because she is. 13 years.
It's almost the same age difference as between Kim and Kendall. Kendall looks younger than Kim, what a surprise!
Kim doesn’t look that much older than Kendall though. Nicole Kidman looks like Kim’s mom in that pic.
Anonymous
12/03/2022 10:26
Subject: Re:High Fashion in your 50s
Halle Berry is nearing 60 and she looks super and fashionable:
https://www.instagram.com/p/CljaYyDrjuk/?igshid=NTdlMDg3MTY=
https://www.instagram.com/p/CljaYyDrjuk/?igshid=NTdlMDg3MTY=
Anonymous
12/02/2022 14:43
Subject: Re:High Fashion in your 50s
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Those are some seriously hideous pants. I can't believe people actually want to wear something called ELEPHANT pants! An animal known more for it's bulk and weight rather than sleekness and grace. If that's high fashion, then I'm glad I am 'drab'. Better than looking ridiculous! I wonder if all the folks swooning over these pants actually like them, or they're saying that just because a social influencer says they're now fashionable.
I'm in my mid 50's and I wore elephant pants in the late 70's. I remember them being all the rage.
Are you planning to wear them this time around?
Are you out of your mind? I'm an adult now
Anonymous
12/02/2022 13:46
Subject: Re:High Fashion in your 50s
Anonymous wrote:Kim looks young though. Nicole looks much much older than her.
...because she is. 13 years.
It's almost the same age difference as between Kim and Kendall. Kendall looks younger than Kim, what a surprise!
Perhaps they should both ditch the Balenciaga at least for the time being. Just sayin.....