Anonymous
Post 09/07/2016 20:52     Subject: Re:Commander in Chief Forum
I was undecided. After tonight I'm with Hillary.
Anonymous
Post 09/07/2016 20:51     Subject: Commander in Chief Forum
This guy is dumber than I thought. He has said absolutely nothing.
Anonymous
Post 09/07/2016 20:50     Subject: Re:Commander in Chief Forum
Neither one is impressive. Just goes to show - again - how poor a choice we have. One is a consummate liar, and the other is out of his league.
Anonymous
Post 09/07/2016 20:50     Subject: Commander in Chief Forum
he isn't answering any of these questions

and then he went on that sidebar about taking the oil.

jeebus.

Anonymous
Post 09/07/2016 20:47     Subject: Commander in Chief Forum
He is so painful to listen to. He sounds ridiculous.
Anonymous
Post 09/07/2016 20:47     Subject: Re:Commander in Chief Forum
What an arrogant douchebag
Anonymous
Post 09/07/2016 20:45     Subject: Commander in Chief Forum
I'm a Hillary supporter and this is making me SO excited for the debates. Trump looks like such a moron. All talk, no action. No ideas. No answers.
Anonymous
Post 09/07/2016 20:40     Subject: Re:Commander in Chief Forum
Trump is such a load of bullshit
Anonymous
Post 09/07/2016 20:38     Subject: Re:Commander in Chief Forum
Trump is way out of his league here. He sounds like a bumbling idiot taking questions from somebody other than Sean Hannity
Anonymous
Post 09/07/2016 20:38     Subject: Re:Commander in Chief Forum
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:She keeps saying classified material has a header in order for it to be classified. That's incorrect. Classified material is such by virtue of its content,whether marked or unmarked. Hillary signed a document saying she recognized that.


The issue is classified info being on a low-side server at all, though... Classified information shouldn't be in a state.gov email either, it's not a secure classified environment. So, issues with classification aren't the same as issues with her private server, which most people find objectionable because it seems like a way to conceal information from FOIA, which is kind of the exact opposite problem.

Also, I'm pretty sure the classified info was sent TO her, which I don't think you can really fault her for. And it was inconsistently marked and some of the stuff that was marked wasn't actually classified etc etc. I think the classification stuff is mostly a false flag. Talk about FOIA concerns if you want to hit her on email.

Well, we know that she had instructed one of her aides to remove classified headers on a fax and send it unsecured. Bet she had the same instructions to her staff - and so she's sticking with the "no header" excuse. None of this would be an issue if she hadn't set up the secret unsecured server in the first place.


It would be because state.gov emails are not hosted on a secure server.
Anonymous
Post 09/07/2016 20:38     Subject: Commander in Chief Forum
So is it me or is Trump not actually answering the questions being asked of him?
Anonymous
Post 09/07/2016 20:37     Subject: Re:Commander in Chief Forum
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:She keeps saying classified material has a header in order for it to be classified. That's incorrect. Classified material is such by virtue of its content,whether marked or unmarked. Hillary signed a document saying she recognized that.


The issue is classified info being on a low-side server at all, though... Classified information shouldn't be in a state.gov email either, it's not a secure classified environment. So, issues with classification aren't the same as issues with her private server, which most people find objectionable because it seems like a way to conceal information from FOIA, which is kind of the exact opposite problem.

Also, I'm pretty sure the classified info was sent TO her, which I don't think you can really fault her for. And it was inconsistently marked and some of the stuff that was marked wasn't actually classified etc etc. I think the classification stuff is mostly a false flag. Talk about FOIA concerns if you want to hit her on email.

Well, we know that she had instructed one of her aides to remove classified headers on a fax and send it unsecured. Bet she had the same instructions to her staff - and so she's sticking with the "no header" excuse. None of this would be an issue if she hadn't set up the secret unsecured server in the first place.
Anonymous
Post 09/07/2016 20:34     Subject: Re:Commander in Chief Forum
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Not a whole lot of comments on Hillary's "showing." Bet when Trump takes the stage, there will be criticism and insults galore.


The thread title was too obscure for me to have any idea what the thread was about before clicking and reading.

OP. That was my fault. Don't think there's any way for me to edit it though.
Anonymous
Post 09/07/2016 20:33     Subject: Re:Commander in Chief Forum
Anonymous wrote:She keeps saying classified material has a header in order for it to be classified. That's incorrect. Classified material is such by virtue of its content,whether marked or unmarked. Hillary signed a document saying she recognized that.


The issue is classified info being on a low-side server at all, though... Classified information shouldn't be in a state.gov email either, it's not a secure classified environment. So, issues with classification aren't the same as issues with her private server, which most people find objectionable because it seems like a way to conceal information from FOIA, which is kind of the exact opposite problem.

Also, I'm pretty sure the classified info was sent TO her, which I don't think you can really fault her for. And it was inconsistently marked and some of the stuff that was marked wasn't actually classified etc etc. I think the classification stuff is mostly a false flag. Talk about FOIA concerns if you want to hit her on email.
Anonymous
Post 09/07/2016 20:29     Subject: Re:Commander in Chief Forum
Anonymous wrote:Not a whole lot of comments on Hillary's "showing." Bet when Trump takes the stage, there will be criticism and insults galore.


The thread title was too obscure for me to have any idea what the thread was about before clicking and reading.