Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Clinton on Planned Parenthood"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]This post is such a red herring. She is talking about a constitutional amendment allowing abortion, which would be huge. For that to happen, yes, you have to compromise. The compromise banning late term abortion, except for health reasons for the mother and fetus, is quite reasonable. The grey areas are not quite this grey as you make them out to be in the day and age when we have such extensive in-utero testing ability. But of course, I guess it's better to worry about Roe v. Wade at every turn rather than have something set in stone via constitutional amendment, right? In either case, all of this is moot, because Republicans will never let a constitutional amendment pass. And all it shows is that HRC can think longterm and pragmatically, whereas some of you are more preoccupied with faux concerns about her consistency. [/quote] This. Can you imagine if we didn't have to defend Roe from death by a thousand hate group cuts? Since literally NO WOMAN is changing her mind in the third trimester, if we got abortion, free and clear with [i]normal[/i] regulations like every other health care provider has (instead of this hospital operating theater nonsense), fine. So long as women who have health problems and fetuses with catastrophic problems (as defined by doctors, not anti-choice goobers), golden.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics