Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This thread should be called “Clinton on abortion.”
Unless, of course, abortion is the primary purpose of Planned Parenthood, contrary to what many of you have been saying all along.
I thought about that but I was hoping to avoid random right wing loonies if possible. I didn't want abortion in the title. I know PP does a lot more than that.
I don’t understand your hesitation to use the word, “abortion,” when that is what this thread is about.
It’s almost as if you believe abortion is a dirty word.
Of course not. Have you ever been involved in a thread when anti-abortion people hijack? It can get really ugly and I wanted to talk about this with people who are not insane. Some people choose topics from "recent topics" and if the title said abortion, I thought they might be all over it. It could have been a miscalculation on my part but it was what I thought was best in order to have a reasonable discussion.
Ha. And, you think a title with “Planned Parenthood” won’t attract people opposed to abortion?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This thread should be called “Clinton on abortion.”
Unless, of course, abortion is the primary purpose of Planned Parenthood, contrary to what many of you have been saying all along.
I thought about that but I was hoping to avoid random right wing loonies if possible. I didn't want abortion in the title. I know PP does a lot more than that.
I don’t understand your hesitation to use the word, “abortion,” when that is what this thread is about.
It’s almost as if you believe abortion is a dirty word.
Of course not. Have you ever been involved in a thread when anti-abortion people hijack? It can get really ugly and I wanted to talk about this with people who are not insane. Some people choose topics from "recent topics" and if the title said abortion, I thought they might be all over it. It could have been a miscalculation on my part but it was what I thought was best in order to have a reasonable discussion.
Anonymous wrote:This post is such a red herring.
She is talking about a constitutional amendment allowing abortion, which would be huge. For that to happen, yes, you have to compromise. The compromise banning late term abortion, except for health reasons for the mother and fetus, is quite reasonable. The grey areas are not quite this grey as you make them out to be in the day and age when we have such extensive in-utero testing ability.
But of course, I guess it's better to worry about Roe v. Wade at every turn rather than have something set in stone via constitutional amendment, right?
In either case, all of this is moot, because Republicans will never let a constitutional amendment pass.
And all it shows is that HRC can think longterm and pragmatically, whereas some of you are more preoccupied with faux concerns about her consistency.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This thread should be called “Clinton on abortion.”
Unless, of course, abortion is the primary purpose of Planned Parenthood, contrary to what many of you have been saying all along.
I thought about that but I was hoping to avoid random right wing loonies if possible. I didn't want abortion in the title. I know PP does a lot more than that.
I don’t understand your hesitation to use the word, “abortion,” when that is what this thread is about.
It’s almost as if you believe abortion is a dirty word.
Anonymous wrote:This post is such a red herring.
She is talking about a constitutional amendment allowing abortion, which would be huge. For that to happen, yes, you have to compromise. The compromise banning late term abortion, except for health reasons for the mother and fetus, is quite reasonable. The grey areas are not quite this grey as you make them out to be in the day and age when we have such extensive in-utero testing ability.
But of course, I guess it's better to worry about Roe v. Wade at every turn rather than have something set in stone via constitutional amendment, right?
In either case, all of this is moot, because Republicans will never let a constitutional amendment pass.
And all it shows is that HRC can think longterm and pragmatically, whereas some of you are more preoccupied with faux concerns about her consistency.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This thread should be called “Clinton on abortion.”
Unless, of course, abortion is the primary purpose of Planned Parenthood, contrary to what many of you have been saying all along.
I thought about that but I was hoping to avoid random right wing loonies if possible. I didn't want abortion in the title. I know PP does a lot more than that.
Anonymous wrote:I don't see this as compromising. I think she will stand firm. Don't forget, when a mothers life is threatened late in pregnancy, most often the baby is delivered preterm and treated in the NICU. It's not an abortion, it's a preterm delivery that tries to save both the mother and baby.
Anonymous wrote:This thread should be called “Clinton on abortion.”
Unless, of course, abortion is the primary purpose of Planned Parenthood, contrary to what many of you have been saying all along.
Anonymous wrote:It sure sounds like partial concession to me...