Reply to Missing boyfriend in Maine

Forum Index » Website Feedback

Reply to "Missing boyfriend in Maine"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=jsteele][quote=Anonymous]Oh come on, Jeff.

You deleted my post and I'm crying foul (although I know I have no right to and that won't change your mind).

I gave a very reasonable explanation of why people might think that OP is fake. I did not call her names, and I was very polite. I even acknowledged that she may be legit! I merely explained why people might think she is fake and why she should not be enraged or surprised.

Your deleting it and shutting down an explanation as reasonable as any other for what is going on is a disservice to the 126 pages of posters who are invested in a thread and there is no harm exploring that as a possibility so posters can decide for themselves to stay invested in her or decide they've been had.

I can understand deleting posts that just read TROL!!!! but I didn't do that. I usually agree with your moderation, but I think this time, helping OP scrub her thread clean of doubters is a disservice to the rest of us.

I'm done now. As you can see from my posting history, I don't usually complain to you about your moderation.[/quote]

The problem with your post, and why I deleted it, was that it was partially based on a false assumption that you probably didn't realize. You stated that nobody was calling the OP names but just questioning whether she was a troll. One could argue that calling a poster a troll is itself calling her a name, but more to the point, I deleted many posts calling her names. You appeared to be telling the OP that she was getting angry in response to legitimate questions when, in fact, she had legitimate reasons to be angry. The vast majority of those reading the thread appeared to be interested in the drama and didn't really care if it was true or not. The constant attempts to "out" the OP were distracting.
[/quote]

But Jeff, objectively, the OP was the one feeding the thread, and at least two seperate similar threads - with all sorts of conflicting data. And now the OP is feeding the story in a off shoot thread...

I see the point about calling an OP a troll is name calling if not a troll...but the idea that she wasn't 'feeding the beast' and engading in the 'outing' through the incomplete and timely dropping of facts unknown to the mystery I think is unfair to PPs point about her reaction to questions about the story's veracity.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics