jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oh come on, Jeff.
You deleted my post and I'm crying foul (although I know I have no right to and that won't change your mind).
I gave a very reasonable explanation of why people might think that OP is fake. I did not call her names, and I was very polite. I even acknowledged that she may be legit! I merely explained why people might think she is fake and why she should not be enraged or surprised.
Your deleting it and shutting down an explanation as reasonable as any other for what is going on is a disservice to the 126 pages of posters who are invested in a thread and there is no harm exploring that as a possibility so posters can decide for themselves to stay invested in her or decide they've been had.
I can understand deleting posts that just read TROL!!!! but I didn't do that. I usually agree with your moderation, but I think this time, helping OP scrub her thread clean of doubters is a disservice to the rest of us.
I'm done now. As you can see from my posting history, I don't usually complain to you about your moderation.
The problem with your post, and why I deleted it, was that it was partially based on a false assumption that you probably didn't realize. You stated that nobody was calling the OP names but just questioning whether she was a troll. One could argue that calling a poster a troll is itself calling her a name, but more to the point, I deleted many posts calling her names. You appeared to be telling the OP that she was getting angry in response to legitimate questions when, in fact, she had legitimate reasons to be angry. The vast majority of those reading the thread appeared to be interested in the drama and didn't really care if it was true or not. The constant attempts to "out" the OP were distracting.
Oh come on, Jeff.
You deleted my post and I'm crying foul (although I know I have no right to and that won't change your mind).
I gave a very reasonable explanation of why people might think that OP is fake. I did not call her names, and I was very polite. I even acknowledged that she may be legit! I merely explained why people might think she is fake and why she should not be enraged or surprised.
Your deleting it and shutting down an explanation as reasonable as any other for what is going on is a disservice to the 126 pages of posters who are invested in a thread and there is no harm exploring that as a possibility so posters can decide for themselves to stay invested in her or decide they've been had.
I can understand deleting posts that just read TROL!!!! but I didn't do that. I usually agree with your moderation, but I think this time, helping OP scrub her thread clean of doubters is a disservice to the rest of us.
I'm done now. As you can see from my posting history, I don't usually complain to you about your moderation.
The problem with your post, and why I deleted it, was that it was partially based on a false assumption that you probably didn't realize. You stated that nobody was calling the OP names but just questioning whether she was a troll. One could argue that calling a poster a troll is itself calling her a name, but more to the point, I deleted many posts calling her names. You appeared to be telling the OP that she was getting angry in response to legitimate questions when, in fact, she had legitimate reasons to be angry. The vast majority of those reading the thread appeared to be interested in the drama and didn't really care if it was true or not. The constant attempts to "out" the OP were distracting.
Anonymous wrote:Oh come on, Jeff.
You deleted my post and I'm crying foul (although I know I have no right to and that won't change your mind).
I gave a very reasonable explanation of why people might think that OP is fake. I did not call her names, and I was very polite. I even acknowledged that she may be legit! I merely explained why people might think she is fake and why she should not be enraged or surprised.
Your deleting it and shutting down an explanation as reasonable as any other for what is going on is a disservice to the 126 pages of posters who are invested in a thread and there is no harm exploring that as a possibility so posters can decide for themselves to stay invested in her or decide they've been had.
I can understand deleting posts that just read TROL!!!! but I didn't do that. I usually agree with your moderation, but I think this time, helping OP scrub her thread clean of doubters is a disservice to the rest of us.
I'm done now. As you can see from my posting history, I don't usually complain to you about your moderation.
I agree. I know this thread is a money maker for you but has passed the point of spinning out of control. The op has repeatedly asked that it be locked.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:op of thread here. Jeff, please lock this thread. I'm really NOT ok with the info I got from the trooper and the comments that some people are making is not helping at all so I would really appreaciate it if you could lock my thread.
Jeff if this is from the OP, please lock the thread.
Anonymous wrote:op of thread here. Jeff, please lock this thread. I'm really NOT ok with the info I got from the trooper and the comments that some people are making is not helping at all so I would really appreaciate it if you could lock my thread.
Anonymous wrote:a lot of people are indeed invested, regardless of whether it's real or a hoax, so please consider carefully before deleting. if you have to do anything, I'd suggest locking the thread, but the OP continues to engage so I"m not sure she wants it locked.
Anonymous wrote:Jeff, I was all about this thread for a long time, but the information that the OP received from the cops strongly indicate that something tragic has happened. I think the thread should be locked because at this point, the boyfriend is officially a missing person and the various people crying TROLL TROLL TROLL are probably just making this woman feel worse.