Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Infertility Support and Discussion
Reply to "How bad is 0% morphology?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]On the Kruger scale my DH was at 3% and we were told that our chances of a healthy conception were slim. In 2 years we did get pregnant once but miscarried at 11 weeks. The product of conception was examined and a chromosomal abnormality associated with bad sperm was the cause of miscarriage. The urologist saw DH and he had a varicocele so we had two choices. IVF with ICSI (IUI is a waste of time and money with bad morphology and any RE who suggests it is just milking you) or a varicocele repair (very painful and can take 6 months for results and not a guarantee to fix the problem). We opted for IVF and got pregnant right out of the gate and had a healthy pregnancy. DH then opted for the repair and and 6 months after the surgery we got pregnant on the first try and another healthy pregnancy. We didn't have any other issues though. But depending on age, I would not wait.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
