Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Reply to "De factor segregation threatens MCPS"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] But what benefit is a diverse school to the wealthy? How did my presence benefit the rich kids?[/quote] Rich kids who went to school with non-rich kids, in my belief (but I don't have data for this), are less likely to assume that: 1. Everybody (or at least everybody who matters) has all the advantages they have; 2. They are not actually rich, because there are people who are richer than they are; 3. Rich people are rich because they are more hard-working and intelligent than non-rich people; 4. Poor people are smelly, lazy, and distasteful. People who do not assume these things are better human beings than people who do assume these things. And if being a better human being isn't a benefit, what is?[/quote] Rich people are more intelligent and hard-working than non-rich people in this area. Sorry you haven't figured that out yet.[/quote] I don't believe that affluent people are harder working than poorer people. [b]I do think they have skills which the job market values more highly[/b]. I also think that generally these marketable skills correlate with intelligence. So, you're probably half right.[/quote] I disagree. Several years ago, I managed a staff of about 20 people. I hired. And I found that some affluent people were far more difficult to manage because they refused to pitch in and help as a team effort. They considered some work below them, and they did not take direction well. Again, I say SOME affluent people, not all. The less affluent people I had on staff had a more limited vocabulary, but they took direction better, were eager to learn, and were more cooperative in the sense that they were willing to do tasks that weren't part of their main job description when those tasks needed to be done. The second part of what you say is also wrong. I don't think affluence = intelligence. Higher SES kids might score better on tests, but it is not because they are more intelligent. It is usually because they are exposed to more stuff that is relevant to the tests (i.e. their families use a larger vocabulary, et cetera). But that is not the same as intelligence. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics