Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
But what benefit is a diverse school to the wealthy? How did my presence benefit the rich kids?
Rich kids who went to school with non-rich kids, in my belief (but I don't have data for this), are less likely to assume that:
1. Everybody (or at least everybody who matters) has all the advantages they have;
2. They are not actually rich, because there are people who are richer than they are;
3. Rich people are rich because they are more hard-working and intelligent than non-rich people;
4. Poor people are smelly, lazy, and distasteful.
People who do not assume these things are better human beings than people who do assume these things. And if being a better human being isn't a benefit, what is?
Rich people are more intelligent and hard-working than non-rich people in this area. Sorry you haven't figured that out yet.
I don't believe that affluent people are harder working than poorer people. I do think they have skills which the job market values more highly. I also think that generally these marketable skills correlate with intelligence. So, you're probably half right.
Blurgh. What about the highly educated people who choose less lucrative careers, like teacher or nonprofit exec, etc. etc.? I am constantly shocked at the arrogance of west county people who believe that their wealth is a signal that they are superior.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
But what benefit is a diverse school to the wealthy? How did my presence benefit the rich kids?
Rich kids who went to school with non-rich kids, in my belief (but I don't have data for this), are less likely to assume that:
1. Everybody (or at least everybody who matters) has all the advantages they have;
2. They are not actually rich, because there are people who are richer than they are;
3. Rich people are rich because they are more hard-working and intelligent than non-rich people;
4. Poor people are smelly, lazy, and distasteful.
People who do not assume these things are better human beings than people who do assume these things. And if being a better human being isn't a benefit, what is?
Rich people are more intelligent and hard-working than non-rich people in this area. Sorry you haven't figured that out yet.
I don't believe that affluent people are harder working than poorer people. I do think they have skills which the job market values more highly. I also think that generally these marketable skills correlate with intelligence. So, you're probably half right.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
But what benefit is a diverse school to the wealthy? How did my presence benefit the rich kids?
Rich kids who went to school with non-rich kids, in my belief (but I don't have data for this), are less likely to assume that:
1. Everybody (or at least everybody who matters) has all the advantages they have;
2. They are not actually rich, because there are people who are richer than they are;
3. Rich people are rich because they are more hard-working and intelligent than non-rich people;
4. Poor people are smelly, lazy, and distasteful.
People who do not assume these things are better human beings than people who do assume these things. And if being a better human being isn't a benefit, what is?
Rich people are more intelligent and hard-working than non-rich people in this area. Sorry you haven't figured that out yet.
I don't believe that affluent people are harder working than poorer people. I do think they have skills which the job market values more highly. I also think that generally these marketable skills correlate with intelligence. So, you're probably half right.
Anonymous wrote:My rising 4th grader goes to a diverse ES in MoCo and there is definitely segregation within the class. At this point, I am not sure though that my kid has really clued in: all of the minority kids are in the lower reading and math groups and all of the white kids are in the higher ones. All of the minority kids buy lunch daily and the white kids do not. The white kids have playdates and sleepovers with one another, minority kids are usually not asked to be included. The list goes on. That is not to say there aren't friendships between the kids but that they are not very deep.
My kindergartner was the only white boy in his class this year and I have concerns about how this will play out in the future socially. None of the other boys ever invited him over, they don't have birthday parties, etc. This is not the end of the world but to me, these are normal kid things and I hate that he is missing out.
I think that in the long run the exposure to a diverse set of cultures and backgrounds is good but in the short run I worry.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
But what benefit is a diverse school to the wealthy? How did my presence benefit the rich kids?
Rich kids who went to school with non-rich kids, in my belief (but I don't have data for this), are less likely to assume that:
1. Everybody (or at least everybody who matters) has all the advantages they have;
2. They are not actually rich, because there are people who are richer than they are;
3. Rich people are rich because they are more hard-working and intelligent than non-rich people;
4. Poor people are smelly, lazy, and distasteful.
People who do not assume these things are better human beings than people who do assume these things. And if being a better human being isn't a benefit, what is?
Rich people are more intelligent and hard-working than non-rich people in this area. Sorry you haven't figured that out yet.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
But what benefit is a diverse school to the wealthy? How did my presence benefit the rich kids?
Rich kids who went to school with non-rich kids, in my belief (but I don't have data for this), are less likely to assume that:
1. Everybody (or at least everybody who matters) has all the advantages they have;
2. They are not actually rich, because there are people who are richer than they are;
3. Rich people are rich because they are more hard-working and intelligent than non-rich people;
4. Poor people are smelly, lazy, and distasteful.
People who do not assume these things are better human beings than people who do assume these things. And if being a better human being isn't a benefit, what is?
Anonymous wrote:My rising 4th grader goes to a diverse ES in MoCo and there is definitely segregation within the class. At this point, I am not sure though that my kid has really clued in: all of the minority kids are in the lower reading and math groups and all of the white kids are in the higher ones. All of the minority kids buy lunch daily and the white kids do not. The white kids have playdates and sleepovers with one another, minority kids are usually not asked to be included. The list goes on. That is not to say there aren't friendships between the kids but that they are not very deep.
Anonymous wrote:Unless you live in a small town that only has one high school, isn't this happening in every city/school district across the country?
Even that small town would need to have 1 elementary, 1 jr. high.
I grew up in a small town. My small town had 5 elementary schools that fed into 1 jr. high and 1 high school. When I went to elementary school in the '80's, our school was the "poor school" and you bet the town people knew what were the good (rich) schools.
When we were all combined in jr. high and high school, we were still segregated - just this time based on what classes we were taking.
I do understand the author's point, but this isn't a unique problem to MCPS. It's happening all over the countyr.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Personally, I would value more diversity and we're lucky to be in great cluster that is internationally diverse. It hasn't been brought here but IMO busing or school-wide choice is bad solution to the problem.
One of the compelling aspects of public school is community. We switched from private and the fact that the kids go to school with neighbors makes a big difference. They see each other at activities in the area and it requires less planning to car pool and just have people over. The school fun events are more widely attended because everyone is close by. These things do make a difference for kids and is an experience I would like them to continue to have.
I also don't think its good from a safety standpoint to have young children commuting 30+ minutes to an hour each way to another school.
Agree with this. We are in a W school and if it was a county wide school, and kids in our neighborhood went to schools all over, then we would probably go back to private school. I suspect the same would be true of others. Then MCPS becomes more like DCPS.
Oh the horror. I am a W school graduate who sends her DCs to DCPS. W schools are completely overrated. Their test scores are nothing more than a reflection of SES. If your child went to school with a more socio-economically diverse group of students he/she would do just as well. I guarantee it.
Anonymous wrote:I currently live in Rockville, but am relatively new to the area. I've definately noticed the segregation in MCPS. Does anyone know if there is something similar happening in VA? Or are the counties there more equal (racially and economically)? Just curious...