Reply to Any new ECNL teams?

Forum Index » Soccer

Reply to "Any new ECNL teams?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]
If you don’t think “travel” soccer is for you, there are many options in the area where your DC can play and not travel.  I suggest you join one of those and stop bothering parents that signed their DC up for travel soccer about the trials of traveling.  You sound like the person that signs their kid up for rec soccer and complains it is too recreational.[/quote]

ECNL parent here.  I do understand travel is travel.  BUT making players and parents drive to Ashville, NC for weekend game is ridiculous.[/quote]

I don't think that the HFC club that is out there should have been given NL or even RL status (because of remoteness and the fact that they are not competitive at all). One of the frustrating things about ECNL is that they will allow a club like that in (and let's be honest, HFC is mid-level town travel club, which is fine but it is/was no where near ready for more than that) but will veto much better/larger clubs because they happen to be close to existing ECNL/RL clubs. It is short-sited and drove a bunch of clubs to MLSN2. [/quote]

When I saw a club in Asheville was joining the MA, my heart sank and then I was filled with joy when I saw it was only on the boys side.  Asheville is a freaking haul, even from Richmond. [/quote]

It is not bad for a weekend event. I used to coach a team and go out to HFC's fall tournament. It was a lot of fun (we really only traveled out of town for that tournament) so the trip wasn't too bad and the HFC teams were semi-competitive (but would still lose to the middle level travel club I was at). I was shocked when when I saw they got RL and was floored with I saw NL. Not sure who they paid or how connected they must be but it is crazy. [/quote]

If you were shocked HFC got RL, you were probably even more shocked they won or finished top 3 in 5 of the 6 age groups (winning in 3) in RL last year. Their 09s won the RL national finals to boot.

So it was about as cut and dried obvious to promote them to NL based on RL success as any club that moved up LY, other than maybe Kansas Rush.

They have gotten shellacked in the early going, no doubt. But they'll be fine in NL over the long run, assuming players/families can tolerate the travel, which is patently absurd for them and really everyone else in MA.  They're experiencing the growing pains of moving up a level, it happens, the kids eventually get acclimated to the speed of the game and they're fine.  Won't be any different here, it's a solid club.[/quote]

They also have to field RL teams now as well. They are going to get wrecked (their younger RL are already getting wrecked). They do not have the player or population base, in any aspect, to do this. They are an average mid-sized club. If they end up 'fine' in NL it is purely due to everyone else leaving. They were getting 'mercy-ruled' by most teams, there is no amount of acclimation to speed of play that is going to make a major difference there. This was a purely political decision by ECNL. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics