Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "Rigor between LACs"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Not interested in hearing how woke you think these schools are. Back when I was applying to college, Haverford was seen as one of the most intense, grade deflated liberal arts colleges you could apply to. Has it kept its rigorous reputation as a challenging place to go to school academically? What about Wesleyan, Claremont McKenna, or Wellesley?[/quote] Haverford is no longer rigorous. Of the schools you mentioned, CMC is the most rigorous, and the most bro. Although Wellesley is pretty “bro” in its own right.[/quote] CMC is not particularly rigorous, it is typical for a school with kids in the academic profile that attend. It is the most pre-professional of the schools mentioned. All of these schools are excellent.[/quote] What does typical mean in this context?[/quote] Typical in this case means a top SLAC. Swat is called "where fun goes to die", Middlebury is known for the highest workload among the NESCACs, etc. but all of these schools are more similar than different because students at any top SLAC are driven, smart and they will be challenged because they can handle the load. They will be pushed because that it what happens when you are among entire populations that fir this profile. People constantly get on these forums and try to find differences where none really exist. [/quote] Quite the opposite, actually.[/quote] Please explain exactly why you believe that when the actual data shows that at the top dozen or so schools the academic profiles for the students are virtually identical. Or why the largest correlated factor in the schools ranking is the size of their endowment? Why do you believe there is an actual difference? Point to something.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics