Anonymous wrote:Not interested in hearing how woke you think these schools are.
Back when I was applying to college, Haverford was seen as one of the most intense, grade deflated liberal arts colleges you could apply to. Has it kept its rigorous reputation as a challenging place to go to school academically? What about Wesleyan, Claremont McKenna, or Wellesley?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s a super woke school.
How did last nights election work out for you little Karen?
The NYC election is going to work out pretty well since I own Florida real estate. To da mudda fuggin moon!
If you own FL. real estate you are already cooked. That election isn't going to save you.
A million Mamdani refugees are about to say otherwise, dork.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Avoid Haverford & Wesleyanunless the student is super woke and cares more about social warrior issues than about academics & a career.
No-one cares.
Apparently OP does !
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Avoid Haverford & Wesleyanunless the student is super woke and cares more about social warrior issues than about academics & a career.
No-one cares.
Anonymous wrote:Avoid Haverford & Wesleyanunless the student is super woke and cares more about social warrior issues than about academics & a career.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not interested in hearing how woke you think these schools are.
Back when I was applying to college, Haverford was seen as one of the most intense, grade deflated liberal arts colleges you could apply to. Has it kept its rigorous reputation as a challenging place to go to school academically? What about Wesleyan, Claremont McKenna, or Wellesley?
Haverford is no longer rigorous. Of the schools you mentioned, CMC is the most rigorous, and the most bro. Although Wellesley is pretty “bro” in its own right.
CMC is not particularly rigorous, it is typical for a school with kids in the academic profile that attend. It is the most pre-professional of the schools mentioned. All of these schools are excellent.
What does typical mean in this context?
Typical in this case means a top SLAC. Swat is called "where fun goes to die", Middlebury is known for the highest workload among the NESCACs, etc. but all of these schools are more similar than different because students at any top SLAC are driven, smart and they will be challenged because they can handle the load. They will be pushed because that it what happens when you are among entire populations that fir this profile. People constantly get on these forums and try to find differences where none really exist.
Quite the opposite, actually.
Anonymous wrote:Williams is the best in Econ out of all LACs in terms of rigor and strength.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s a super woke school.
How did last nights election work out for you little Karen?
The NYC election is going to work out pretty well since I own Florida real estate. To da mudda fuggin moon!
If you own FL. real estate you are already cooked. That election isn't going to save you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not interested in hearing how woke you think these schools are.
Back when I was applying to college, Haverford was seen as one of the most intense, grade deflated liberal arts colleges you could apply to. Has it kept its rigorous reputation as a challenging place to go to school academically? What about Wesleyan, Claremont McKenna, or Wellesley?
Haverford is no longer rigorous. Of the schools you mentioned, CMC is the most rigorous, and the most bro. Although Wellesley is pretty “bro” in its own right.
CMC is not particularly rigorous, it is typical for a school with kids in the academic profile that attend. It is the most pre-professional of the schools mentioned. All of these schools are excellent.
What does typical mean in this context?
Typical in this case means a top SLAC. Swat is called "where fun goes to die", Middlebury is known for the highest workload among the NESCACs, etc. but all of these schools are more similar than different because students at any top SLAC are driven, smart and they will be challenged because they can handle the load. They will be pushed because that it what happens when you are among entire populations that fir this profile. People constantly get on these forums and try to find differences where none really exist.
Anonymous wrote:Williams is the best in Econ out of all LACs in terms of rigor and strength.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not interested in hearing how woke you think these schools are.
Back when I was applying to college, Haverford was seen as one of the most intense, grade deflated liberal arts colleges you could apply to. Has it kept its rigorous reputation as a challenging place to go to school academically? What about Wesleyan, Claremont McKenna, or Wellesley?
Haverford is no longer rigorous. Of the schools you mentioned, CMC is the most rigorous, and the most bro. Although Wellesley is pretty “bro” in its own right.
CMC is not particularly rigorous, it is typical for a school with kids in the academic profile that attend. It is the most pre-professional of the schools mentioned. All of these schools are excellent.
What does typical mean in this context?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s a super woke school.
How did last nights election work out for you little Karen?
The NYC election is going to work out pretty well since I own Florida real estate. To da mudda fuggin moon!